From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cornelia Huck Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] vfio: ccw: error handling fixes and improvements Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 16:29:40 +0200 Message-ID: <20180524162940.13d3b2df.cohuck@redhat.com> References: <20180523025645.8978-1-bjsdjshi@linux.ibm.com> <20180523122129.5f765d24.cohuck@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com To: Dong Jia Shi Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180523122129.5f765d24.cohuck@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 23 May 2018 12:21:29 +0200 Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 23 May 2018 04:56:41 +0200 > Dong Jia Shi wrote: > > > Dear Reviewers, > > > > Here is a new version for this patch series. > > > > We didn't get agreement on patch #4 (#5 in v2) in the former cycle though, > > I made it based on my understanding. We can continue discussing on it. > > I'll probably go ahead and queue 1-3 (would not mind r-bs, though) in > any case. > > I hope we can queue the tracing patch as well, as any tracing beats no > tracing :) OK, I've pushed this out to the vfio-ccw branch. Would still be great to get some R-bs. What about sending a pull req next week, so that we get this ready for the 4.18 merge window?