kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@intel.com,
	jmattson@google.com, karahmed@amazon.de, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa@csail.mit.edu>,
	"Matt Helsley (VMware)" <matt.helsley@gmail.com>,
	Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@vmware.com>, Bo Gan <ganb@vmware.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 042/107] x86/speculation: Move firmware_restrict_branch_speculation_*() from C to CPP
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 14:41:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180723122414.989603876@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180723122413.003644357@linuxfoundation.org>

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

commit d72f4e29e6d84b7ec02ae93088aa459ac70e733b upstream.

firmware_restrict_branch_speculation_*() recently started using
preempt_enable()/disable(), but those are relatively high level
primitives and cause build failures on some 32-bit builds.

Since we want to keep <asm/nospec-branch.h> low level, convert
them to macros to avoid header hell...

Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com
Cc: bp@alien8.de
Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com
Cc: jmattson@google.com
Cc: karahmed@amazon.de
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: rkrcmar@redhat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa@csail.mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Matt Helsley (VMware) <matt.helsley@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Bo Gan <ganb@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---

 arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h |   26 ++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
@@ -214,20 +214,22 @@ static inline void indirect_branch_predi
 /*
  * With retpoline, we must use IBRS to restrict branch prediction
  * before calling into firmware.
+ *
+ * (Implemented as CPP macros due to header hell.)
  */
-static inline void firmware_restrict_branch_speculation_start(void)
-{
-	preempt_disable();
-	alternative_msr_write(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, SPEC_CTRL_IBRS,
-			      X86_FEATURE_USE_IBRS_FW);
-}
+#define firmware_restrict_branch_speculation_start()			\
+do {									\
+	preempt_disable();						\
+	alternative_msr_write(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, SPEC_CTRL_IBRS,	\
+			      X86_FEATURE_USE_IBRS_FW);			\
+} while (0)
 
-static inline void firmware_restrict_branch_speculation_end(void)
-{
-	alternative_msr_write(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, 0,
-			      X86_FEATURE_USE_IBRS_FW);
-	preempt_enable();
-}
+#define firmware_restrict_branch_speculation_end()			\
+do {									\
+	alternative_msr_write(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, 0,			\
+			      X86_FEATURE_USE_IBRS_FW);			\
+	preempt_enable();						\
+} while (0)
 
 #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-07-23 12:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20180723122413.003644357@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-07-23 12:41 ` [PATCH 4.4 031/107] x86/speculation: Update Speculation Control microcode blacklist Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-07-23 12:41 ` [PATCH 4.4 032/107] x86/speculation: Correct Speculation Control microcode blacklist again Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-07-23 12:41 ` [PATCH 4.4 041/107] x86/speculation: Use IBRS if available before calling into firmware Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-07-23 12:41 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180723122414.989603876@linuxfoundation.org \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=amakhalov@vmware.com \
    --cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=ganb@vmware.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=karahmed@amazon.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt.helsley@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=srivatsa@csail.mit.edu \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).