From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cornelia Huck Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/22] s390: vfio-ap: register matrix device with VFIO mdev framework Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 13:06:07 +0200 Message-ID: <20180809130607.32781b72.cohuck@redhat.com> References: <1533739472-7172-1-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1533739472-7172-10-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, freude@de.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, berrange@redhat.com, fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, buendgen@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, Tony Krowiak To: Tony Krowiak Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1533739472-7172-10-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 8 Aug 2018 10:44:19 -0400 Tony Krowiak wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c > index d7e39ad..6a827f3 100644 > --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include "vfio_ap_private.h" > > #define VFIO_AP_ROOT_NAME "vfio_ap" > @@ -68,6 +69,18 @@ static int vfio_ap_matrix_dev_create(void) > { > int ret; > > + mutex_init(&matrix_dev.lock); > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&matrix_dev.mdev_list); > + > + /* Test if PQAP(QCI) instruction is available */ > + if (test_facility(12)) { > + ret = ap_qci(&matrix_dev.info); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + } > + > + atomic_set(&matrix_dev.available_instances, MAX_ZDEV_ENTRIES_EXT); > + > ret = misc_register(&matrix_dev.misc_dev); OK, you are adding more stuff other than the miscdevice after all... still, I don't think that this is a good idea. I think I had already asked this for a previous version: Why has this been turned into a miscdevice? (I think my reaction to the answer was 'meh'... but I think more and more that we should not do that.) > if (ret) > return ret;