Re: [PATCH V5 2/4] target-i386:add coalesced_pio API

[<peng.hao2@zte.com.cn>]

>> +static void kvm_coalesce_pio_add(MemoryListener *listener,
>> +                                MemoryRegionSection *section,
>> +                                hwaddr start, hwaddr size)
>> +{
>> +    KVMState *s = kvm_state;
>> +
>> +    if (s->coalesced_pio) {
>> +        struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_zone zone;
>> +
>> +        zone.addr = start;
>> +        zone.size = size;
>> +        zone.pio = 1;
>> +
>> +        (void)kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_REGISTER_COALESCED_MMIO, &zone);
>> +    }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void kvm_coalesce_pio_del(MemoryListener *listener,
>> +                                MemoryRegionSection *section,
>> +                                hwaddr start, hwaddr size)
>> +{
>> +    KVMState *s = kvm_state;
>> +
>> +    if (s->coalesced_pio) {
>> +        struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_zone zone;
>> +
>> +        zone.addr = start;
>> +        zone.size = size;
>> +        zone.pio = 1;
>> +
>> +        (void)kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_UNREGISTER_COALESCED_MMIO, &zone);
>> +     }
>> +}
>assert rather than (void)?
I think (void) is better.  qemu can work well even if coalesced mmio/pio regiser operation failed.