From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Sean Christopherson" <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] x86/kvm: Avoid dynamic allocation of pvclock data when SEV is active
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 14:27:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180910122727.GE21815@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1536343050-18532-6-git-send-email-brijesh.singh@amd.com>
On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 12:57:30PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> Currently, the per-cpu pvclock data is allocated dynamically when
> cpu > HVC_BOOT_ARRAY_SIZE.
Well no, you need to write this correctly - what is "cpu >
HVC_BOOT_ARRAY_SIZE" ?!
( I know what it is but I know it only because I've looked at that code before. )
So no, please explain it in English not in code.
> The physical address of this variable is
> shared between the guest and the hypervisor hence it must be mapped as
> unencrypted (ie. C=0) when SEV is active.
This sentence is a good example about how to explain stuff in commit
messages.
> The C-bit works on a page,
"The C-bit determines the encryption status of a 4K page."
> hence we will be required to perform a
Use passive tone in your commit message: no "we", etc...
> full 4k page allocation to store a single 32-byte pvclock variable. It
> will waste fairly sizeable amount of memory since each CPU will be doing
"... will waste *a* fairly sizeable amount of ..."
> a separate 4k allocation.
Start new paragraph here and use passive tone.
> Let's define a second array for the SEV case to
> statically allocate for NR_CPUS and put this array in .data..decrypted
NR_CPUS needs explaining for the unenlightened reader. Also,
"... put this array in *the* .data..decrypted section... "
> section so that its mapped with C=0 during boot.
<---- newline here.
> The .data..decrypted
> section has a big chunk of memory that is currently unused. And since
> second array will be used only when memory encryption is active hence
"... since *the* second array... "
s/hence //
> free it when encryption is not active.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 4 ++++
> arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 3 +++
> arch/x86/mm/init.c | 3 +++
> arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
> index 802b2eb..cc46584 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
> @@ -48,11 +48,13 @@ int __init early_set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long size);
>
> /* Architecture __weak replacement functions */
> void __init mem_encrypt_init(void);
> +void __init free_decrypted_mem(void);
Proper prefixing:
"mem_encrypt_free_decrypted"
or so
> bool sme_active(void);
> bool sev_active(void);
>
> #define __decrypted __attribute__((__section__(".data..decrypted")))
> +#define __decrypted_aux __attribute__((__section__(".data..decrypted.aux")))
>
> #else /* !CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT */
>
> @@ -80,6 +82,7 @@ static inline int __init
> early_set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long size) { return 0; }
>
> #define __decrypted
> +#define __decrypted_aux
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT */
>
> @@ -93,6 +96,7 @@ early_set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long size) { return 0;
> #define __sme_pa_nodebug(x) (__pa_nodebug(x) | sme_me_mask)
>
> extern char __start_data_decrypted[], __end_data_decrypted[];
> +extern char __start_data_decrypted_aux[];
>
> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c
> index 376fd3a..6086b56 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c
> @@ -65,6 +65,15 @@ static struct pvclock_vsyscall_time_info
> static struct pvclock_wall_clock wall_clock __decrypted;
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pvclock_vsyscall_time_info *, hv_clock_per_cpu);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
> +/*
> + * The auxiliary array will be used when SEV is active. In non-SEV case,
> + * it will be freed by free_decrypted_mem().
> + */
> +static struct pvclock_vsyscall_time_info
> + hv_clock_aux[NR_CPUS] __decrypted_aux;
Hmm, so worst case that's 64 4K pages:
(8192*32)/4096 = 64 4K pages.
Now, the real question from all this SNAFU is, why can't all those point
to a single struct pvclock_vsyscall_time_info and all CPUs read a single
thing? Why do they have to be per-CPU and thus waste so much memory?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-10 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-07 17:57 [PATCH v6 0/5] x86: Fix SEV guest regression Brijesh Singh
2018-09-07 17:57 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] x86/mm: Restructure sme_encrypt_kernel() Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 11:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-07 17:57 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] x86/mm: fix sme_populate_pgd() to update page flags Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 11:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-10 12:28 ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 12:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-07 17:57 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] x86/mm: add .data..decrypted section to hold shared variables Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 11:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-10 12:33 ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-07 17:57 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] x86/kvm: use __decrypted attribute in " Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 12:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-10 13:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-10 13:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-10 15:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-10 12:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-09-10 12:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-10 12:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-09-07 17:57 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] x86/kvm: Avoid dynamic allocation of pvclock data when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 12:27 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2018-09-10 13:15 ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 13:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-10 15:10 ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 15:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-10 15:30 ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 16:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-11 9:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-09-11 10:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-11 10:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-09-11 10:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-11 11:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-09-11 13:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-11 14:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-09-10 15:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-10 16:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-10 16:14 ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 12:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180910122727.GE21815@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@suse.de \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox