From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Corbet Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 01/13] ktask: add documentation Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 10:26:38 -0700 Message-ID: <20181108102638.3415ae0b@lwn.net> References: <20181105165558.11698-1-daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> <20181105165558.11698-2-daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aarcange@redhat.com, aaron.lu@intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com, bsd@redhat.com, darrick.wong@oracle.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, jgg@mellanox.com, jwadams@google.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, mhocko@kernel.org, mike.kravetz@oracle.com, Pavel.Tatashin@microsoft.com, prasad.singamsetty@oracle.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, steven.sistare@oracle.com, tim.c.chen@intel.com, tj@kernel.org, vbabka@suse.cz To: Daniel Jordan Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20181105165558.11698-2-daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 11:55:46 -0500 Daniel Jordan wrote: > Motivates and explains the ktask API for kernel clients. A couple of quick thoughts: - Agree with Peter on the use of "task"; something like "job" would be far less likely to create confusion. Maybe you could even call it a "batch job" to give us old-timers warm fuzzies...:) - You have kerneldoc comments for the API functions, but you don't pull those into the documentation itself. Adding some kernel-doc directives could help to fill things out nicely with little effort. Thanks, jon