From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Halil Pasic Subject: Re: RE: [PATCH v1 0/2] Virtio: fix some vq allocation issues Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 20:13:41 +0100 Message-ID: <20190102201341.28bf9378@oc2783563651> References: <1545963986-11280-1-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> <286AC319A985734F985F78AFA26841F73DEEA8E9@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> <20181230070600.512bbb8b@oc2783563651> <286AC319A985734F985F78AFA26841F73DEEC8DF@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> <20190101004019.7f20aafa@oc2783563651> <20190102105314.0b4e2485.cohuck@redhat.com> <20190102142338.15bfe876.cohuck@redhat.com> <20190102165919.0cd9365a@oc2783563651> <20190102190233.69b267fb.cohuck@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Wang, Wei W" , Christian Borntraeger , "virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "mst@redhat.com" , "pbonzini@redhat.com" , "dgilbert@redhat.com" To: Cornelia Huck Return-path: Sender: List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: In-Reply-To: <20190102190233.69b267fb.cohuck@redhat.com> List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 19:02:33 +0100 Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 16:59:19 +0100 > Halil Pasic wrote: > > > On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 14:23:38 +0100 > > Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 10:53:14 +0100 > > > Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 00:40:19 +0100 > > > > Halil Pasic wrote: > > > > > > AFAICT tweaking the balloon code may be simpler than tweaking the > > > > > virtio-ccw (transport code). ccw_io_helper() relies on getting > > > > > an interrupt when the issued IO is done. If virtio-ccw is buggy, it > > > > > needs to be fixed, but I'm not sure it is. > > > > > > > > I would not call virtio-ccw buggy, but it has some constraints that > > > > virtio-pci apparently doesn't have (and which did not show up so far; > > > > e.g. virtio-blk schedules a work item on config change, so there's no > > > > deadlock there.) > > > > > > > > One way to get out of that constraint (don't interact with the config > > > > space directly in the config changed handler) would be to schedule a > > > > work item in virtio-ccw that calls virtio_config_changed() for the > > > > device. My understanding is that delaying the notification to a work > > > > queue would be fine. > > > > > > Unfortunately, calling virtio_config_changed() from a work item is not > > > enough: That function takes the config_lock, and the virtio-ccw code to > > > get the config both needs to allocate some memory and call schedule :/ > > > > > > The best option really seems to be > > > - have virtio-balloon move the handling of the config change onto a > > > workqueue or something like that, and > > > - document that you cannot read/write the virtio config space from an > > > atomic context > > > > > > Unless someone has a better idea? > > > > > > > I wonder, would making config_lock a mutex suffice? > > Unless I'm mistaken, you can't take a mutex in an interrupt path. > I was too focused on virtio-ccw. We have the workqueue now, so it would not be a problem for us, but for the other transports. Grrr