From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH net] vhost: fix OOB in get_rx_bufs() Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 20:36:31 -0500 Message-ID: <20190129203157-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20190128.225444.1929870241029842289.davem@davemloft.net> <20190129175145-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20190129.151026.358327408932275252.davem@davemloft.net> <20190129.153810.493942539151548676.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: jasowang@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190129.153810.493942539151548676.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 03:38:10PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: David Miller > Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 15:10:26 -0800 (PST) > > > Yeah the CVE pushed my hand a little bit, and I knew I was going to > > send Linus a pull request today because David Watson needs some TLS > > changes in net-next. > > I also want to make a general comment.... for the record. > > If I let patches slip consistently past 24 hours my backlog is > unmanageable. Even with aggressively applying things quickly I'm > right now at 70-75. If I do not do what I am doing, then it's in the > 100-150 range. > > So I am at the point where I often must move forward with patches that > I think I personally can verify and vet on my own. If it helps I can include most virtio stuff in my pull requests instead. Or if that can't work since there's too often a dependency on net-next, maybe Jason wants to create a tree and send pull requests to you. Let us know if that will help, and which of the options looks better from your POV. -- MST