From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
"Rik van Riel" <riel@surriel.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/22] x86/fpu: Let __fpu__restore_sig() restore the !32bit+fxsr frame from kernel memory
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 22:29:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190130212903.GI18383@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190109114744.10936-21-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 12:47:42PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> The !32bit+fxsr case loads the new state from user memory. In case we
^^^^^^^^^^^
Let's "decrypt" that: "The 64-bit case where fast FXSAVE/FXRSTOR are used... "
But looking at the patch, it is not only about the fxsr but also the
use_xsave() case. So pls write out exactly what you mean here.
Ditto for the patch title.
> restore the FPU state on return to userland we can't do this. It would
> be required to disable preemption in order to avoid a context switch
> which would set TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD. If this happens before the "restore"
> operation then the loaded registers would become volatile.
>
> Disabling preemption while accessing user memory requires to disable the
> pagefault handler. An error during XRSTOR would then mean that either a
> page fault occured (and we have to retry with enabled page fault
> handler) or a #GP occured because the xstate is bogus (after all the
> sig-handler can modify it).
>
> In order to avoid that mess, copy the FPU state from userland, validate
> it and then load it. The copy_users_…() helper are basically the old
> helper except that they operate on kernel memory and the fault handler
> just sets the error value and the caller handles it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h | 32 ++++++++++-----
> arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h
> index 16ea30235b025..672e51bc0e9b5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h
> @@ -120,6 +120,21 @@ extern void fpstate_sanitize_xstate(struct fpu *fpu);
> err; \
> })
>
> +#define kernel_insn_norestore(insn, output, input...) \
> +({ \
> + int err; \
> + asm volatile("1:" #insn "\n\t" \
> + "2:\n" \
> + ".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n" \
> + "3: movl $-1,%[err]\n" \
> + " jmp 2b\n" \
> + ".previous\n" \
> + _ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 3b) \
> + : [err] "=r" (err), output \
> + : "0"(0), input); \
> + err; \
> +})
user_insn above looks unused - just repurpose it.
> +
> #define kernel_insn(insn, output, input...) \
> asm volatile("1:" #insn "\n\t" \
> "2:\n" \
> @@ -140,15 +155,15 @@ static inline void copy_kernel_to_fxregs(struct fxregs_state *fx)
> }
> }
>
> -static inline int copy_user_to_fxregs(struct fxregs_state __user *fx)
> +static inline int copy_users_to_fxregs(struct fxregs_state *fx)
Why "users" ?
> {
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32))
> - return user_insn(fxrstor %[fx], "=m" (*fx), [fx] "m" (*fx));
> + return kernel_insn_norestore(fxrstor %[fx], "=m" (*fx), [fx] "m" (*fx));
> else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AS_FXSAVEQ))
> - return user_insn(fxrstorq %[fx], "=m" (*fx), [fx] "m" (*fx));
> + return kernel_insn_norestore(fxrstorq %[fx], "=m" (*fx), [fx] "m" (*fx));
>
> /* See comment in copy_fxregs_to_kernel() below. */
> - return user_insn(rex64/fxrstor (%[fx]), "=m" (*fx), [fx] "R" (fx),
> + return kernel_insn_norestore(rex64/fxrstor (%[fx]), "=m" (*fx), [fx] "R" (fx),
> "m" (*fx));
> }
>
> @@ -157,9 +172,9 @@ static inline void copy_kernel_to_fregs(struct fregs_state *fx)
> kernel_insn(frstor %[fx], "=m" (*fx), [fx] "m" (*fx));
> }
>
> -static inline int copy_user_to_fregs(struct fregs_state __user *fx)
> +static inline int copy_users_to_fregs(struct fregs_state *fx)
> {
> - return user_insn(frstor %[fx], "=m" (*fx), [fx] "m" (*fx));
> + return kernel_insn_norestore(frstor %[fx], "=m" (*fx), [fx] "m" (*fx));
> }
>
> static inline void copy_fxregs_to_kernel(struct fpu *fpu)
> @@ -339,16 +354,13 @@ static inline void copy_kernel_to_xregs(struct xregs_state *xstate, u64 mask)
> /*
> * Restore xstate from user space xsave area.
> */
> -static inline int copy_user_to_xregs(struct xregs_state __user *buf, u64 mask)
> +static inline int copy_users_to_xregs(struct xregs_state *xstate, u64 mask)
> {
> - struct xregs_state *xstate = ((__force struct xregs_state *)buf);
> u32 lmask = mask;
> u32 hmask = mask >> 32;
> int err;
>
> - stac();
> XSTATE_OP(XRSTOR, xstate, lmask, hmask, err);
> - clac();
>
> return err;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c
> index 970091fb011e9..4ed5c400cac58 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c
> @@ -217,7 +217,8 @@ sanitize_restored_xstate(union fpregs_state *state,
> */
> xsave->i387.mxcsr &= mxcsr_feature_mask;
>
> - convert_to_fxsr(&state->fxsave, ia32_env);
> + if (ia32_env)
> + convert_to_fxsr(&state->fxsave, ia32_env);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -299,28 +300,63 @@ static int __fpu__restore_sig(void __user *buf, void __user *buf_fx, int size)
> kfree(tmp);
> return err;
> } else {
> + union fpregs_state *state;
> + void *tmp;
> int ret;
>
> + tmp = kzalloc(sizeof(*state) + fpu_kernel_xstate_size + 64, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!tmp)
> + return -ENOMEM;
<---- newline here.
> + state = PTR_ALIGN(tmp, 64);
> +
> /*
> * For 64-bit frames and 32-bit fsave frames, restore the user
> * state to the registers directly (with exceptions handled).
> */
> - if (use_xsave()) {
> - if ((unsigned long)buf_fx % 64 || fx_only) {
> + if ((unsigned long)buf_fx % 64)
> + fx_only = 1;
> +
> + if (use_xsave() && !fx_only) {
> + u64 init_bv = xfeatures_mask & ~xfeatures;
Define that init_bv in the function prologue above and then you don't
need to define it again here and below in a narrower scope.
> +
> + if (using_compacted_format()) {
> + ret = copy_user_to_xstate(&state->xsave, buf_fx);
> + } else {
> + ret = __copy_from_user(&state->xsave, buf_fx, state_size);
> +
> + if (!ret && state_size > offsetof(struct xregs_state, header))
> + ret = validate_xstate_header(&state->xsave.header);
> + }
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_out;
<---- newline here.
> + sanitize_restored_xstate(state, NULL, xfeatures,
> + fx_only);
Let that stick out.
And then do that here:
init_bv = xfeatures_mask & ~xfeatures;> +
> + if (unlikely(init_bv))
> + copy_kernel_to_xregs(&init_fpstate.xsave, init_bv);
and add a newline here so that this code above belongs together visually.
> + ret = copy_users_to_xregs(&state->xsave, xfeatures);
> +
...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-30 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-09 11:47 [PATCH v6] x86: load FPU registers on return to userland Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 01/22] x86/fpu: Remove fpu->initialized usage in __fpu__restore_sig() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-14 16:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-05 10:08 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 02/22] x86/fpu: Remove fpu__restore() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 03/22] x86/fpu: Remove preempt_disable() in fpu__clear() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-14 18:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 04/22] x86/fpu: Always init the `state' " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-14 19:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 05/22] x86/fpu: Remove fpu->initialized usage in copy_fpstate_to_sigframe() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-16 19:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-16 22:40 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-17 12:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-18 21:14 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-18 21:17 ` Dave Hansen
2019-01-18 21:37 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-18 21:43 ` Dave Hansen
2019-01-21 11:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-01-22 13:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-22 16:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-01-22 17:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-05 11:34 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-02-05 11:17 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-02-26 16:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-03-08 18:12 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-02-05 14:37 ` [PATCH 05/22 v2] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 06/22] x86/fpu: Don't save fxregs for ia32 frames " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-24 11:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-05 16:43 ` [PATCH 06/22 v2] x86/fpu: Don't save fxregs for ia32 frames in Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 07/22] x86/fpu: Remove fpu->initialized Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-24 13:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-05 18:03 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-02-06 14:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-07 10:13 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-02-07 10:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-05 18:06 ` [PATCH 07/22 v2] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 08/22] x86/fpu: Remove user_fpu_begin() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-25 15:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-05 18:16 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 09/22] x86/fpu: Add (__)make_fpregs_active helpers Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-28 18:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-07 10:43 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-02-13 9:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-14 14:51 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 10/22] x86/fpu: Make __raw_xsave_addr() use feature number instead of mask Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-28 18:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 11/22] x86/fpu: Make get_xsave_field_ptr() and get_xsave_addr() " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-28 18:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-07 11:13 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-02-13 9:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 12/22] x86/fpu: Only write PKRU if it is different from current Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-23 18:09 ` Dave Hansen
2019-02-07 11:27 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 13/22] x86/pkeys: Don't check if PKRU is zero before writting it Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 14/22] x86/fpu: Eager switch PKRU state Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 15/22] x86/entry: Add TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-30 11:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-07 11:49 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-02-13 9:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-14 15:28 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 16/22] x86/fpu: Always store the registers in copy_fpstate_to_sigframe() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-30 11:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-07 13:28 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 17/22] x86/fpu: Prepare copy_fpstate_to_sigframe() for TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-30 11:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-30 12:28 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-30 12:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-07 14:10 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 18/22] x86/fpu: Update xstate's PKRU value on write_pkru() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-23 17:28 ` Dave Hansen
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 19/22] x86/fpu: Inline copy_user_to_fpregs_zeroing() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 20/22] x86/fpu: Let __fpu__restore_sig() restore the !32bit+fxsr frame from kernel memory Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-30 21:29 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 21/22] x86/fpu: Merge the two code paths in __fpu__restore_sig() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 22/22] x86/fpu: Defer FPU state load until return to userspace Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-31 9:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-15 12:44 ` [PATCH v6] x86: load FPU registers on return to userland David Laight
2019-01-15 13:15 ` 'Sebastian Andrzej Siewior'
2019-01-15 14:33 ` David Laight
2019-01-15 19:46 ` Dave Hansen
2019-01-15 20:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-01-15 20:54 ` Dave Hansen
2019-01-15 21:11 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-01-16 10:31 ` David Laight
2019-01-16 10:18 ` David Laight
2019-01-30 11:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-30 12:06 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-30 12:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-08 13:12 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-02-13 15:54 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-02-21 11:49 [PATCH v7] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-02-21 11:50 ` [PATCH 20/22] x86/fpu: Let __fpu__restore_sig() restore the !32bit+fxsr frame from kernel memory Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190130212903.GI18383@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).