From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, pagupta@redhat.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com, riel@surriel.com, david@redhat.com,
dodgen@google.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, dhildenb@redhat.com,
aarcange@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][Patch v8 5/7] virtio: Enables to add a single descriptor to the host
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 08:29:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190206082942.29f52fe9@doriath> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1d478678-0a14-a144-2efc-10ff13cf1a5a@redhat.com>
On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 08:24:14 -0500
Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 2/6/19 8:15 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 07:56:37 -0500
> > Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 2/5/19 3:49 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 03:18:52PM -0500, Nitesh Narayan Lal wrote:
> >>>> This patch enables the caller to expose a single buffers to the
> >>>> other end using vring descriptor. It also allows the caller to
> >>>> perform this action in synchornous manner by using virtqueue_kick_sync.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com>
> >>> I am not sure why do we need this API. Polling in guest
> >>> until host runs isn't great either since these
> >>> might be running on the same host CPU.
> >> True.
> >>
> >> However, my understanding is that the existing API such as
> >> virtqueue_add_outbuf() requires an allocation which will be problematic
> >> for my implementation.
> >> Although I am not blocking the allocation path during normal Linux
> >> kernel usage as even if one of the zone is locked the other zone could
> >> be used to get free pages.
> >> But during the initial boot time (device initialization), in certain
> >> situations the allocation can only come from a single zone, acquiring a
> >> lock on it may result in a deadlock situation.
> > I might be wrong, but if I remember correctly, this was true for
> > your previous implementation where you'd report page hinting down
> > from arch_free_page() so you couldn't allocate memory. But this
> > is not the case anymore.
>
> With the earlier implementation, the allocation was blocked all the time
> when freeing was going on.
> With this implementation, the allocation is not blocked during normal
> Linux kernel usage (after Linux boots up). For example, on a 64 bit
> machine, if the Normal zone is locked and there is an allocation request
> then it can be served by DMA32 zone as well. (This is not the case
> during device initialization time)
> Feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
That's what I meant :) I have an impression that your virtio API
was necessary because of your earlier design. I guess it's not needed
anymore as Michael says.
>
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>> include/linux/virtio.h | 4 ++
> >>>> 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> >>>> index cd7e755484e3..93c161ac6a28 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> >>>> @@ -1695,6 +1695,52 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> >>>> out_sgs, in_sgs, data, ctx, gfp);
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> +/**
> >>>> + * virtqueue_add_desc - add a buffer to a chain using a vring desc
> >>>> + * @vq: the struct virtqueue we're talking about.
> >>>> + * @addr: address of the buffer to add.
> >>>> + * @len: length of the buffer.
> >>>> + * @in: set if the buffer is for the device to write.
> >>>> + *
> >>>> + * Returns zero or a negative error (ie. ENOSPC, ENOMEM, EIO).
> >>>> + */
> >>>> +int virtqueue_add_desc(struct virtqueue *_vq, u64 addr, u32 len, int in)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> >>>> + struct vring_desc *desc = vq->split.vring.desc;
> >>>> + u16 flags = in ? VRING_DESC_F_WRITE : 0;
> >>>> + unsigned int i;
> >>>> + void *data = (void *)addr;
> >>>> + int avail_idx;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + /* Sanity check */
> >>>> + if (!_vq)
> >>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + START_USE(vq);
> >>>> + if (unlikely(vq->broken)) {
> >>>> + END_USE(vq);
> >>>> + return -EIO;
> >>>> + }
> >>>> +
> >>>> + i = vq->free_head;
> >>>> + flags &= ~VRING_DESC_F_NEXT;
> >>>> + desc[i].flags = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev, flags);
> >>>> + desc[i].addr = cpu_to_virtio64(_vq->vdev, addr);
> >>>> + desc[i].len = cpu_to_virtio32(_vq->vdev, len);
> >>>> +
> >>>> + vq->vq.num_free--;
> >>>> + vq->free_head = virtio16_to_cpu(_vq->vdev, desc[i].next);
> >>>> + vq->split.desc_state[i].data = data;
> >>>> + vq->split.avail_idx_shadow = 1;
> >>>> + avail_idx = vq->split.avail_idx_shadow;
> >>>> + vq->split.vring.avail->idx = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev, avail_idx);
> >>>> + vq->num_added = 1;
> >>>> + END_USE(vq);
> >>>> + return 0;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtqueue_add_desc);
> >>>> +
> >>>> /**
> >>>> * virtqueue_add_sgs - expose buffers to other end
> >>>> * @vq: the struct virtqueue we're talking about.
> >>>> @@ -1842,6 +1888,32 @@ bool virtqueue_notify(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> >>>> }
> >>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtqueue_notify);
> >>>>
> >>>> +/**
> >>>> + * virtqueue_kick_sync - update after add_buf and busy wait till update is done
> >>>> + * @vq: the struct virtqueue
> >>>> + *
> >>>> + * After one or more virtqueue_add_* calls, invoke this to kick
> >>>> + * the other side. Busy wait till the other side is done with the update.
> >>>> + *
> >>>> + * Caller must ensure we don't call this with other virtqueue
> >>>> + * operations at the same time (except where noted).
> >>>> + *
> >>>> + * Returns false if kick failed, otherwise true.
> >>>> + */
> >>>> +bool virtqueue_kick_sync(struct virtqueue *vq)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + u32 len;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + if (likely(virtqueue_kick(vq))) {
> >>>> + while (!virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len) &&
> >>>> + !virtqueue_is_broken(vq))
> >>>> + cpu_relax();
> >>>> + return true;
> >>>> + }
> >>>> + return false;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtqueue_kick_sync);
> >>>> +
> >>>> /**
> >>>> * virtqueue_kick - update after add_buf
> >>>> * @vq: the struct virtqueue
> >>>> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio.h b/include/linux/virtio.h
> >>>> index fa1b5da2804e..58943a3a0e8d 100644
> >>>> --- a/include/linux/virtio.h
> >>>> +++ b/include/linux/virtio.h
> >>>> @@ -57,6 +57,10 @@ int virtqueue_add_sgs(struct virtqueue *vq,
> >>>> unsigned int in_sgs,
> >>>> void *data,
> >>>> gfp_t gfp);
> >>>> +/* A desc with this init id is treated as an invalid desc */
> >>>> +int virtqueue_add_desc(struct virtqueue *_vq, u64 addr, u32 len, int in);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +bool virtqueue_kick_sync(struct virtqueue *vq);
> >>>>
> >>>> bool virtqueue_kick(struct virtqueue *vq);
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> 2.17.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-06 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 116+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-04 20:18 [RFC][Patch v8 0/7] KVM: Guest Free Page Hinting Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-04 20:18 ` [RFC][Patch v8 1/7] KVM: Support for guest free page hinting Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-05 4:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-05 13:06 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-05 16:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-05 16:34 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-04 20:18 ` [RFC][Patch v8 2/7] KVM: Enabling guest free page hinting via static key Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-08 18:07 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-02-08 18:22 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-04 20:18 ` [RFC][Patch v8 3/7] KVM: Guest free page hinting functional skeleton Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-04 20:18 ` [RFC][Patch v8 4/7] KVM: Disabling page poisoning to prevent corruption Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-07 17:23 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-02-07 17:56 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-07 18:24 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-02-07 19:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-07 21:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-04 20:18 ` [RFC][Patch v8 5/7] virtio: Enables to add a single descriptor to the host Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-05 20:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-06 12:56 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-06 13:15 ` Luiz Capitulino
2019-02-06 13:24 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-06 13:29 ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]
2019-02-06 14:05 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-06 18:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-06 18:19 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-04 20:18 ` [RFC][Patch v8 6/7] KVM: Enables the kernel to isolate and report free pages Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-05 20:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-05 21:54 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-05 21:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-07 17:43 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-02-07 19:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-07 20:50 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-08 17:58 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-02-08 20:41 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-08 21:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-08 22:05 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-02-10 0:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-11 9:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-12 5:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-12 17:10 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-08 21:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-04 20:18 ` [RFC][Patch v8 7/7] KVM: Adding tracepoints for guest page hinting Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-04 20:20 ` [RFC][QEMU PATCH] KVM: Support for guest free " Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-12 9:03 ` [RFC][Patch v8 0/7] KVM: Guest Free Page Hinting Wang, Wei W
2019-02-12 9:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-12 17:24 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-12 19:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-13 8:55 ` Wang, Wei W
2019-02-13 9:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-13 12:17 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-13 17:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-13 17:22 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
[not found] ` <286AC319A985734F985F78AFA26841F73DF6F1C3@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2019-02-14 9:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-13 17:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-13 17:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-13 19:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-14 9:08 ` Wang, Wei W
2019-02-14 10:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-14 10:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-15 9:15 ` Wang, Wei W
2019-02-15 9:33 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-13 9:00 ` Wang, Wei W
2019-02-13 12:06 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-14 8:48 ` Wang, Wei W
2019-02-14 9:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-15 9:05 ` Wang, Wei W
2019-02-15 9:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-18 2:36 ` Wei Wang
2019-02-18 2:39 ` Wei Wang
2019-02-15 12:40 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-14 13:00 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-16 9:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-18 15:50 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-18 16:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-18 16:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-18 16:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-18 17:31 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-02-18 17:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-18 23:47 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-02-19 2:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-19 2:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-02-19 12:52 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-19 16:23 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-02-19 8:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-19 14:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-19 14:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-19 14:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-18 18:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-18 17:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-18 18:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-18 19:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-18 19:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-18 19:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-18 20:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-18 20:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-18 20:40 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-18 21:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-19 0:01 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-02-19 7:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-19 18:06 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-02-19 18:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-19 21:57 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-02-19 22:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-19 22:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-19 19:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-19 20:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-19 20:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-19 20:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-19 20:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-19 12:47 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-19 13:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-19 14:17 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-02-19 14:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-18 20:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-23 0:02 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-02-25 13:01 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190206082942.29f52fe9@doriath \
--to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dhildenb@redhat.com \
--cc=dodgen@google.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=nitesh@redhat.com \
--cc=pagupta@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).