public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
	Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/17] wlcore: Align reg_ch_conf_pending and tmp_ch_bitmap to unsigned long for better performance
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 13:41:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190304124144.GD32477@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44bb6771-7aea-c44d-6605-45e7a1499d1b@redhat.com>

On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 11:46:52AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] wlcore: simplify/fix/optimize reg_ch_conf_pending operations
> 
> Bitmaps are defined on unsigned longs, so the usage of u32[2] in the
> wlcore driver is incorrect.  As noted by Peter Zijlstra, casting arrays
> to a bitmap is incorrect for big-endian architectures.
> 
> When looking at it I observed that:
> 
> - operations on reg_ch_conf_pending is always under the wl_lock mutex,
> so set_bit is overkill
> 
> - the only case where reg_ch_conf_pending is accessed a u32 at a time is
> unnecessary too.
> 
> This patch cleans up everything in this area, and changes tmp_ch_bitmap
> to have the proper alignment.
> 
> Reported-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c
> index 903968735a74..3e093f3a7ec8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c
> @@ -1700,14 +1700,14 @@ void wlcore_set_pending_regdomain_ch(struct wl1271 *wl, u16 channel,
>  	ch_bit_idx = wlcore_get_reg_conf_ch_idx(band, channel);
>  
>  	if (ch_bit_idx >= 0 && ch_bit_idx <= WL1271_MAX_CHANNELS)
> -		set_bit(ch_bit_idx, (long *)wl->reg_ch_conf_pending);
> +		__set_bit_le(ch_bit_idx, (long *)wl->reg_ch_conf_pending);
>  }
>  
>  int wlcore_cmd_regdomain_config_locked(struct wl1271 *wl)
>  {
>  	struct wl12xx_cmd_regdomain_dfs_config *cmd = NULL;
>  	int ret = 0, i, b, ch_bit_idx;
> -	u32 tmp_ch_bitmap[2];
> +	u32 tmp_ch_bitmap[2] __aligned(sizeof(unsigned long));

Also mark it as __le32 ?

>  	struct wiphy *wiphy = wl->hw->wiphy;
>  	struct ieee80211_supported_band *band;
>  	bool timeout = false;
> @@ -1717,7 +1717,7 @@ int wlcore_cmd_regdomain_config_locked(struct wl1271 *wl)
>  
>  	wl1271_debug(DEBUG_CMD, "cmd reg domain config");
>  
> -	memset(tmp_ch_bitmap, 0, sizeof(tmp_ch_bitmap));
> +	memcpy(tmp_ch_bitmap, wl->reg_ch_conf_pending, sizeof(tmp_ch_bitmap));

How about using:

	bitmap_to_arr32(tmp_ch_bitmap, wl->reg_ch_conf_pending, sizeof(tmp_ch_bitmap));
	for (i=0; i<2; i++)
		tmp_ch_bitmap[i] = cpu_to_le32(tmp_ch_bitmap[i]);

(or add bitmap_to_arr32_le ?)

>  	for (b = NL80211_BAND_2GHZ; b <= NL80211_BAND_5GHZ; b++) {
>  		band = wiphy->bands[b];
> @@ -1738,13 +1738,10 @@ int wlcore_cmd_regdomain_config_locked(struct wl1271 *wl)
>  			if (ch_bit_idx < 0)
>  				continue;
>  
> -			set_bit(ch_bit_idx, (long *)tmp_ch_bitmap);
> +			__set_bit_le(ch_bit_idx, (long *)tmp_ch_bitmap);

But you copied in reg_ch_conf_pending without doing an LE swizzle.
With the proposed change, we have two __le32 here and it works again.

>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	tmp_ch_bitmap[0] |= wl->reg_ch_conf_pending[0];
> -	tmp_ch_bitmap[1] |= wl->reg_ch_conf_pending[1];
> -
>  	if (!memcmp(tmp_ch_bitmap, wl->reg_ch_conf_last, sizeof(tmp_ch_bitmap)))
>  		goto out;
>  

And then remove the cpu_to_le32() on assignment to ch_bit_map*.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wlcore.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wlcore.h
> index dd14850b0603..870eea3e7a27 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wlcore.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wlcore.h
> @@ -320,9 +320,9 @@ struct wl1271 {
>  	bool watchdog_recovery;
>  
>  	/* Reg domain last configuration */
> -	u32 reg_ch_conf_last[2]  __aligned(8);
> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(reg_ch_conf_last, 64);

Is never actually used as a bitmap but used as opaque storage with
memcpy and memcmp against tmp_ch_bitmap.

>  	/* Reg domain pending configuration */
> -	u32 reg_ch_conf_pending[2];
> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(reg_ch_conf_pending, 64);
>  
>  	/* Pointer that holds DMA-friendly block for the mailbox */
>  	void *mbox;

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-04 12:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-02  2:44 [PATCH v4 00/17] x86/split_lock: Enable #AC exception for split locked accesses Fenghua Yu
2019-03-02  2:44 ` [PATCH v4 01/17] x86/common: Align cpu_caps_cleared and cpu_caps_set to unsigned long Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04  8:33   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-04 10:17     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-04 10:48       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-04 12:44         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-04 13:13           ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-02  2:44 ` [PATCH v4 02/17] drivers/net/b44: Align pwol_mask to unsigned long for better performance Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 10:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-04 14:45     ` Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 15:27       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-02  2:44 ` [PATCH v4 03/17] wlcore: Align reg_ch_conf_pending and tmp_ch_bitmap " Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 10:11   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-04 10:46     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-04 12:41       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-03-04 13:09         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-04 13:30           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-04 14:40       ` Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 15:54         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-02  2:44 ` [PATCH v4 04/17] x86/split_lock: Align x86_capability to unsigned long to avoid split locked access Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 18:52   ` Dave Hansen
2019-03-04 19:15     ` Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 19:29       ` Dave Hansen
2019-03-04 20:08       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-04 20:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-02  2:44 ` [PATCH v4 05/17] x86/cpufeatures: Enumerate IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES MSR Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 18:53   ` Dave Hansen
2019-03-04 18:55     ` Yu, Fenghua
2019-03-04 19:01       ` Dave Hansen
2019-03-02  2:45 ` [PATCH v4 06/17] x86/msr-index: Define IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY MSR and #AC exception for split lock bit Fenghua Yu
2019-03-02  2:45 ` [PATCH v4 07/17] x86/split_lock: Enumerate #AC for split lock by MSR IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 18:58   ` Dave Hansen
2019-03-04 18:59     ` Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 19:19       ` Dave Hansen
2019-03-02  2:45 ` [PATCH v4 08/17] x86/clearcpuid: Support multiple clearcpuid options Fenghua Yu
2019-03-02  2:45 ` [PATCH v4 09/17] x86/clearcpuid: Support feature flag string in kernel option clearcpuid Fenghua Yu
2019-03-02  2:45 ` [PATCH v4 10/17] x86/clearcpuid: Apply cleared feature bits that are forced set before Fenghua Yu
2019-03-02  2:45 ` [PATCH v4 11/17] x86/clearcpuid: Clear CPUID bit in CPUID faulting Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 22:04   ` kbuild test robot
2019-03-05  7:27   ` kbuild test robot
2019-03-02  2:45 ` [PATCH v4 12/17] Change document for kernel option clearcpuid Fenghua Yu
2019-03-02  2:45 ` [PATCH v4 13/17] x86/split_lock: Handle #AC exception for split lock Fenghua Yu
2019-03-02  2:45 ` [PATCH v4 14/17] x86/split_lock: Add a sysfs interface to allow user to enable or disable split lock detection on all CPUs during run time Fenghua Yu
2019-03-02  2:45 ` [PATCH v4 15/17] kvm: x86: Report CORE_CAPABILITY on GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04  8:38   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-04 10:47     ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-04 10:49       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-04 11:10         ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-04 11:14           ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-04 11:21             ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-05  7:03             ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-02  2:45 ` [PATCH v4 16/17] kvm: x86: Add support IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY MSR Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04  8:42   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-04 12:32     ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-08  6:10     ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-08  7:54       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-08  8:03         ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-02  2:45 ` [PATCH v4 17/17] kvm: vmx: Emulate TEST_CTL MSR Fenghua Yu
2019-03-09  2:31   ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-11 13:31     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-11 15:10       ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-11 15:21         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-11 16:58           ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-04 21:55 ` [PATCH v4 00/17] x86/split_lock: Enable #AC exception for split locked accesses Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2019-03-05  0:06   ` Fenghua Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190304124144.GD32477@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox