From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/17] wlcore: Align reg_ch_conf_pending and tmp_ch_bitmap to unsigned long for better performance
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 13:41:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190304124144.GD32477@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44bb6771-7aea-c44d-6605-45e7a1499d1b@redhat.com>
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 11:46:52AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] wlcore: simplify/fix/optimize reg_ch_conf_pending operations
>
> Bitmaps are defined on unsigned longs, so the usage of u32[2] in the
> wlcore driver is incorrect. As noted by Peter Zijlstra, casting arrays
> to a bitmap is incorrect for big-endian architectures.
>
> When looking at it I observed that:
>
> - operations on reg_ch_conf_pending is always under the wl_lock mutex,
> so set_bit is overkill
>
> - the only case where reg_ch_conf_pending is accessed a u32 at a time is
> unnecessary too.
>
> This patch cleans up everything in this area, and changes tmp_ch_bitmap
> to have the proper alignment.
>
> Reported-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c
> index 903968735a74..3e093f3a7ec8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c
> @@ -1700,14 +1700,14 @@ void wlcore_set_pending_regdomain_ch(struct wl1271 *wl, u16 channel,
> ch_bit_idx = wlcore_get_reg_conf_ch_idx(band, channel);
>
> if (ch_bit_idx >= 0 && ch_bit_idx <= WL1271_MAX_CHANNELS)
> - set_bit(ch_bit_idx, (long *)wl->reg_ch_conf_pending);
> + __set_bit_le(ch_bit_idx, (long *)wl->reg_ch_conf_pending);
> }
>
> int wlcore_cmd_regdomain_config_locked(struct wl1271 *wl)
> {
> struct wl12xx_cmd_regdomain_dfs_config *cmd = NULL;
> int ret = 0, i, b, ch_bit_idx;
> - u32 tmp_ch_bitmap[2];
> + u32 tmp_ch_bitmap[2] __aligned(sizeof(unsigned long));
Also mark it as __le32 ?
> struct wiphy *wiphy = wl->hw->wiphy;
> struct ieee80211_supported_band *band;
> bool timeout = false;
> @@ -1717,7 +1717,7 @@ int wlcore_cmd_regdomain_config_locked(struct wl1271 *wl)
>
> wl1271_debug(DEBUG_CMD, "cmd reg domain config");
>
> - memset(tmp_ch_bitmap, 0, sizeof(tmp_ch_bitmap));
> + memcpy(tmp_ch_bitmap, wl->reg_ch_conf_pending, sizeof(tmp_ch_bitmap));
How about using:
bitmap_to_arr32(tmp_ch_bitmap, wl->reg_ch_conf_pending, sizeof(tmp_ch_bitmap));
for (i=0; i<2; i++)
tmp_ch_bitmap[i] = cpu_to_le32(tmp_ch_bitmap[i]);
(or add bitmap_to_arr32_le ?)
> for (b = NL80211_BAND_2GHZ; b <= NL80211_BAND_5GHZ; b++) {
> band = wiphy->bands[b];
> @@ -1738,13 +1738,10 @@ int wlcore_cmd_regdomain_config_locked(struct wl1271 *wl)
> if (ch_bit_idx < 0)
> continue;
>
> - set_bit(ch_bit_idx, (long *)tmp_ch_bitmap);
> + __set_bit_le(ch_bit_idx, (long *)tmp_ch_bitmap);
But you copied in reg_ch_conf_pending without doing an LE swizzle.
With the proposed change, we have two __le32 here and it works again.
> }
> }
>
> - tmp_ch_bitmap[0] |= wl->reg_ch_conf_pending[0];
> - tmp_ch_bitmap[1] |= wl->reg_ch_conf_pending[1];
> -
> if (!memcmp(tmp_ch_bitmap, wl->reg_ch_conf_last, sizeof(tmp_ch_bitmap)))
> goto out;
>
And then remove the cpu_to_le32() on assignment to ch_bit_map*.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wlcore.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wlcore.h
> index dd14850b0603..870eea3e7a27 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wlcore.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wlcore.h
> @@ -320,9 +320,9 @@ struct wl1271 {
> bool watchdog_recovery;
>
> /* Reg domain last configuration */
> - u32 reg_ch_conf_last[2] __aligned(8);
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(reg_ch_conf_last, 64);
Is never actually used as a bitmap but used as opaque storage with
memcpy and memcmp against tmp_ch_bitmap.
> /* Reg domain pending configuration */
> - u32 reg_ch_conf_pending[2];
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(reg_ch_conf_pending, 64);
>
> /* Pointer that holds DMA-friendly block for the mailbox */
> void *mbox;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-04 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-02 2:44 [PATCH v4 00/17] x86/split_lock: Enable #AC exception for split locked accesses Fenghua Yu
2019-03-02 2:44 ` [PATCH v4 01/17] x86/common: Align cpu_caps_cleared and cpu_caps_set to unsigned long Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 8:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-04 10:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-04 10:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-04 12:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-04 13:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-02 2:44 ` [PATCH v4 02/17] drivers/net/b44: Align pwol_mask to unsigned long for better performance Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 10:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-04 14:45 ` Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 15:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-02 2:44 ` [PATCH v4 03/17] wlcore: Align reg_ch_conf_pending and tmp_ch_bitmap " Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 10:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-04 10:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-04 12:41 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-03-04 13:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-04 13:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-04 14:40 ` Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 15:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-02 2:44 ` [PATCH v4 04/17] x86/split_lock: Align x86_capability to unsigned long to avoid split locked access Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 18:52 ` Dave Hansen
2019-03-04 19:15 ` Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 19:29 ` Dave Hansen
2019-03-04 20:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-04 20:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-02 2:44 ` [PATCH v4 05/17] x86/cpufeatures: Enumerate IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES MSR Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 18:53 ` Dave Hansen
2019-03-04 18:55 ` Yu, Fenghua
2019-03-04 19:01 ` Dave Hansen
2019-03-02 2:45 ` [PATCH v4 06/17] x86/msr-index: Define IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY MSR and #AC exception for split lock bit Fenghua Yu
2019-03-02 2:45 ` [PATCH v4 07/17] x86/split_lock: Enumerate #AC for split lock by MSR IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 18:58 ` Dave Hansen
2019-03-04 18:59 ` Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 19:19 ` Dave Hansen
2019-03-02 2:45 ` [PATCH v4 08/17] x86/clearcpuid: Support multiple clearcpuid options Fenghua Yu
2019-03-02 2:45 ` [PATCH v4 09/17] x86/clearcpuid: Support feature flag string in kernel option clearcpuid Fenghua Yu
2019-03-02 2:45 ` [PATCH v4 10/17] x86/clearcpuid: Apply cleared feature bits that are forced set before Fenghua Yu
2019-03-02 2:45 ` [PATCH v4 11/17] x86/clearcpuid: Clear CPUID bit in CPUID faulting Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 22:04 ` kbuild test robot
2019-03-05 7:27 ` kbuild test robot
2019-03-02 2:45 ` [PATCH v4 12/17] Change document for kernel option clearcpuid Fenghua Yu
2019-03-02 2:45 ` [PATCH v4 13/17] x86/split_lock: Handle #AC exception for split lock Fenghua Yu
2019-03-02 2:45 ` [PATCH v4 14/17] x86/split_lock: Add a sysfs interface to allow user to enable or disable split lock detection on all CPUs during run time Fenghua Yu
2019-03-02 2:45 ` [PATCH v4 15/17] kvm: x86: Report CORE_CAPABILITY on GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 8:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-04 10:47 ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-04 10:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-04 11:10 ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-04 11:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-04 11:21 ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-05 7:03 ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-02 2:45 ` [PATCH v4 16/17] kvm: x86: Add support IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY MSR Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 8:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-04 12:32 ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-08 6:10 ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-08 7:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-08 8:03 ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-02 2:45 ` [PATCH v4 17/17] kvm: vmx: Emulate TEST_CTL MSR Fenghua Yu
2019-03-09 2:31 ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-11 13:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-11 15:10 ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-11 15:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-11 16:58 ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-04 21:55 ` [PATCH v4 00/17] x86/split_lock: Enable #AC exception for split locked accesses Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2019-03-05 0:06 ` Fenghua Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190304124144.GD32477@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox