From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [RFC][Patch v9 2/6] KVM: Enables the kernel to isolate guest free pages Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 21:28:13 -0500 Message-ID: <20190307212654-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20190306155048.12868-1-nitesh@redhat.com> <20190306155048.12868-3-nitesh@redhat.com> <2d9ae889-a9b9-7969-4455-ff36944f388b@redhat.com> <22e4b1cd-38a5-6642-8cbe-d68e4fcbb0b7@redhat.com> <78b604be-2129-a716-a7a6-f5b382c9fb9c@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Hildenbrand , Nitesh Narayan Lal , kvm list , LKML , linux-mm , Paolo Bonzini , lcapitulino@redhat.com, pagupta@redhat.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com, Yang Zhang , Rik van Riel , dodgen@google.com, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , dhildenb@redhat.com, Andrea Arcangeli To: Alexander Duyck Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 02:35:53PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote: > With us hinting currently on MAX_ORDER - 1 pages only that actually > takes care of the risk of a merge really wiping out any data about > what has been hinted on and what hasn't. Oh nice. I had this feeling MAX_ORDER - 1 specifically will turn out being a better choice than something related to THP. Now there's an actual reason why this makes things easier! -- MST