From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: Re:
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 10:21:40 -0600
Message-ID: <20190321162140.GA29342@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20190319144116.400-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
 <488768D7-1396-4DD1-A648-C86E5CF7DB2F@nutanix.com>
 <42f444d22363bc747f4ad75e9f0c27b40a810631.camel@redhat.com>
 <20190321161239.GH31434@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
        "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
        "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
        Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
        "Harris, James R" <james.r.harris@intel.com>,
        Felipe Franciosi <felipe@nutanix.com>,
        Liang Cunming <cunming.liang@intel.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
        Thanos Makatos <thanos.makatos@nutanix.com>,
        Jo
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190321161239.GH31434@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 04:12:39PM +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> mdev-nvme seems like a duplication of SPDK.  The performance is not
> better and the features are more limited, so why focus on this approach?
> 
> One argument might be that the kernel NVMe subsystem wants to offer this
> functionality and loading the kernel module is more convenient than
> managing SPDK to some users.
> 
> Thoughts?

Doesn't SPDK bind a controller to a single process? mdev binds to
namespaces (or their partitions), so you could have many mdev's assigned
to many VMs accessing a single controller.