From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/kvm: Convert some slow-path static_cpu_has()
 callers to boot_cpu_has()
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 17:12:48 +0200
Message-ID: <20190331151248.GB15073@zn.tnic>
References: <20190330112022.28888-1-bp@alien8.de>
 <20190330112022.28888-4-bp@alien8.de>
 <2f71cb35-46b2-9ed5-28b3-c6eb5e647b46@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, x86@kernel.org
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2f71cb35-46b2-9ed5-28b3-c6eb5e647b46@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 04:20:11PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> These are not slow path.

Those functions do a *lot* of stuff like a bunch of MSR reads which are
tens of cycles each at least.

I don't think a RIP-relative MOV and a BT:

        movq    boot_cpu_data+20(%rip), %rax    # MEM[(const long unsigned int *)&boot_cpu_data + 20B], _45
        btq     $59, %rax       #, _45

are at all noticeable.

On latest AMD and Intel uarch those are 2-4 cycles, according to

https://agner.org/optimize/instruction_tables.ods

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.