From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: nadav.amit@gmail.com
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] x86: Prevent APIC base address from changing in test_enable_x2apic()
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 12:00:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190415190027.GJ24010@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190415183100.6827-1-nadav.amit@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1707 bytes --]
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 11:31:00AM -0700, nadav.amit@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
>
> test_enable_x2apic() unintentionally changes the APIC base address to
> zero and resets the BSP indication. This actually causes the local APIC
> to overlap the IDT area, which is wrong. Prevent it from happening by
> keeping the APIC base address and BSP-bit as it was before.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
> ---
> x86/apic.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/x86/apic.c b/x86/apic.c
> index 51744cf..0849f87 100644
> --- a/x86/apic.c
> +++ b/x86/apic.c
> @@ -90,11 +90,11 @@ static void test_enable_x2apic(void)
> report("disabled to x2apic enabled",
> test_write_apicbase_exception(APIC_EN | APIC_EXTD));
>
> - wrmsr(MSR_IA32_APICBASE, APIC_EN);
> + wrmsr(MSR_IA32_APICBASE, APIC_EN | APIC_DEFAULT_PHYS_BASE | APIC_BSP);
> report("apic enabled to invalid state",
> test_write_apicbase_exception(APIC_EXTD));
>
> - wrmsr(MSR_IA32_APICBASE, APIC_EN | APIC_EXTD);
> + wrmsr(MSR_IA32_APICBASE, APIC_EN | APIC_EXTD | APIC_DEFAULT_PHYS_BASE | APIC_BSP);
It probably doesn't matter since AFAIK kvm-unit-tests always uses the
default base, but preserving the current base+BSP would be preferred.
The #GP tests get away with using APIC_DEFAULT_PHYS_BASE because the
WRMSR will never succeed, but even that is poor form. And the test
should also reset to xAPIC when it's done.
I think the attached patch covers everything.
> apic_write(APIC_SPIV, 0x1ff);
> } else {
> printf("x2apic not detected\n");
> --
> 2.17.1
>
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-x86-apic-Preserve-APIC-base-and-BSP-bits-during-x2AP.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 2541 bytes --]
From 0905302c23f20f67483b281e33f1930135087e3a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:53:00 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] x86: apic: Preserve APIC base and BSP bits during x2APIC
tests
...and reset to xAPIC mode unless x2APIC was already enabled.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
---
x86/apic.c | 24 +++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/x86/apic.c b/x86/apic.c
index 51744cf..02b6128 100644
--- a/x86/apic.c
+++ b/x86/apic.c
@@ -69,33 +69,39 @@ static void do_write_apicbase(void *data)
static bool test_write_apicbase_exception(u64 data)
{
- data |= APIC_DEFAULT_PHYS_BASE | APIC_BSP;
return test_for_exception(GP_VECTOR, do_write_apicbase, &data);
}
static void test_enable_x2apic(void)
{
+ u64 orig_apicbase = rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APICBASE);
+ u64 apicbase;
+
if (enable_x2apic()) {
printf("x2apic enabled\n");
+ apicbase = orig_apicbase & ~(APIC_EN | APIC_EXTD);
report("x2apic enabled to invalid state",
- test_write_apicbase_exception(APIC_EXTD));
+ test_write_apicbase_exception(apicbase | APIC_EXTD));
report("x2apic enabled to apic enabled",
- test_write_apicbase_exception(APIC_EN));
+ test_write_apicbase_exception(apicbase | APIC_EN));
report("x2apic enabled to disabled state",
- !test_write_apicbase_exception(0));
+ !test_write_apicbase_exception(apicbase | 0));
report("disabled to invalid state",
- test_write_apicbase_exception(APIC_EXTD));
+ test_write_apicbase_exception(apicbase | APIC_EXTD));
report("disabled to x2apic enabled",
- test_write_apicbase_exception(APIC_EN | APIC_EXTD));
+ test_write_apicbase_exception(apicbase | APIC_EN | APIC_EXTD));
- wrmsr(MSR_IA32_APICBASE, APIC_EN);
+ wrmsr(MSR_IA32_APICBASE, apicbase | APIC_EN);
report("apic enabled to invalid state",
- test_write_apicbase_exception(APIC_EXTD));
+ test_write_apicbase_exception(apicbase | APIC_EXTD));
- wrmsr(MSR_IA32_APICBASE, APIC_EN | APIC_EXTD);
+ wrmsr(MSR_IA32_APICBASE, apicbase | APIC_EN | APIC_EXTD);
apic_write(APIC_SPIV, 0x1ff);
+
+ if (!(orig_apicbase & APIC_EXTD))
+ reset_apic();
} else {
printf("x2apic not detected\n");
--
2.21.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-15 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-15 18:31 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] x86: Prevent APIC base address from changing in test_enable_x2apic() nadav.amit
2019-04-15 19:00 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2019-04-15 19:09 ` Nadav Amit
2019-04-15 19:12 ` Nadav Amit
2019-04-15 19:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-04-15 19:55 ` Nadav Amit
2019-04-15 19:59 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190415190027.GJ24010@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).