From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Perr Zhang <strongbox8@zoho.com>,
pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
stable@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: revert the order of calls in kvm_fast_pio()
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 07:57:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190430145724.GA32170@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190430143201.GH2589@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 04:32:01PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 10:24:23PM +0800, Perr Zhang wrote:
> > In commit 45def77ebf79, the order of function calls in kvm_fast_pio()
> > was changed. This causes that the vm(XP,and also XP's iso img) failed
> > to boot. This doesn't happen with win10 or ubuntu.
> >
> > After revert the order, the vm(XP) succeedes to boot. In addition, the
> > change of calls's order of kvm_fast_pio() in commit 45def77ebf79 has no
> > obvious reason.
There are three reasons explicitly listed in the changelog:
Updating %rip prior to executing to userspace has several drawbacks:
- Userspace sees the wrong %rip on the exit, e.g. if PIO emulation
fails it will likely yell about the wrong address.
- Single step exits to userspace for are effectively dropped as
KVM_EXIT_DEBUG is overwritten with KVM_EXIT_IO.
- Behavior of PIO emulation is different depending on whether it
goes down the fast path or the slow path.
>
> This Changelog fails to explain why the order is important and equally
> fails to inform the future reader of that code. So this very same thing
> will happen again in 6 months time or thereabout.
There's a more precise fix submitted for this bug[1]. In theory v2
already went out, but I still don't see it posted to the KVM list.
Either the KVM list or my mail client is being weird.
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10919849/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-30 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-30 14:24 [PATCH] KVM: x86: revert the order of calls in kvm_fast_pio() Perr Zhang
2019-04-30 14:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-30 14:57 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2019-04-30 15:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-30 14:58 ` Perr Zhang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-04-30 14:20 Perr Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190430145724.GA32170@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=strongbox8@zoho.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox