From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F22ACC04AB4 for ; Tue, 14 May 2019 23:43:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4FD62084E for ; Tue, 14 May 2019 23:43:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726777AbfENXnF (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 May 2019 19:43:05 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:55666 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726718AbfENXm6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 May 2019 19:42:58 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x4ENLugj136349 for ; Tue, 14 May 2019 19:42:57 -0400 Received: from e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.103]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2sg3nc8u71-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 14 May 2019 19:42:57 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 15 May 2019 00:42:55 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.137) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 15 May 2019 00:42:53 +0100 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x4ENgpfq61276184 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 14 May 2019 23:42:51 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C21AE055; Tue, 14 May 2019 23:42:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822A6AE051; Tue, 14 May 2019 23:42:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (unknown [9.152.85.9]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 14 May 2019 23:42:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (Postfix, from userid 4958) id 344F8E157D; Wed, 15 May 2019 01:42:51 +0200 (CEST) From: Eric Farman To: Cornelia Huck , Farhan Ali Cc: Halil Pasic , Pierre Morel , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Eric Farman Subject: [PATCH v2 4/7] s390/cio: Initialize the host addresses in pfn_array Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 01:42:45 +0200 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190514234248.36203-1-farman@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190514234248.36203-1-farman@linux.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19051423-0028-0000-0000-0000036DBABB X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19051423-0029-0000-0000-0000242D4E67 Message-Id: <20190514234248.36203-5-farman@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-05-14_13:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=852 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1905140153 Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org Let's initialize the host address to something that is invalid, rather than letting it default to zero. This just makes it easier to notice when a pin operation has failed or been skipped. Signed-off-by: Eric Farman --- drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c index 60aa784717c5..0a97978d1d28 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c @@ -91,8 +91,11 @@ static int pfn_array_alloc(struct pfn_array *pa, u64 iova, unsigned int len) pa->pa_pfn = pa->pa_iova_pfn + pa->pa_nr; pa->pa_iova_pfn[0] = pa->pa_iova >> PAGE_SHIFT; - for (i = 1; i < pa->pa_nr; i++) + pa->pa_pfn[0] = -1ULL; + for (i = 1; i < pa->pa_nr; i++) { pa->pa_iova_pfn[i] = pa->pa_iova_pfn[i - 1] + 1; + pa->pa_pfn[i] = -1ULL; + } return 0; } -- 2.17.1