From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723DCC04AB5 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 12:57:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5192726CB3 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 12:57:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727403AbfFCM5k (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jun 2019 08:57:40 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:43830 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726336AbfFCM5k (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jun 2019 08:57:40 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x53Cr96r039520 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 08:57:39 -0400 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2sw3tj8pyy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 08:57:38 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 13:57:37 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 3 Jun 2019 13:57:33 +0100 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x53CvVjS52887556 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 3 Jun 2019 12:57:31 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D10452051; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 12:57:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc2783563651 (unknown [9.152.224.145]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9DD52057; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 12:57:31 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 14:57:30 +0200 From: Halil Pasic To: Michael Mueller Cc: Cornelia Huck , KVM Mailing List , Linux-S390 Mailing List , Sebastian Ott , Heiko Carstens , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Christoph Hellwig , Thomas Huth , Christian Borntraeger , Viktor Mihajlovski , Vasily Gorbik , Janosch Frank , Claudio Imbrenda , Farhan Ali , Eric Farman , Pierre Morel Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] s390/cio: introduce DMA pools to cio In-Reply-To: <035b4bd3-5856-e8e5-91bf-ba0b5c7c3736@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190529122657.166148-1-mimu@linux.ibm.com> <20190529122657.166148-3-mimu@linux.ibm.com> <20190603133745.240c00a7.cohuck@redhat.com> <035b4bd3-5856-e8e5-91bf-ba0b5c7c3736@linux.ibm.com> Organization: IBM X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19060312-0020-0000-0000-000003442F56 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19060312-0021-0000-0000-00002197316D Message-Id: <20190603145730.3e45b8f5.pasic@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-06-03_10:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906030093 Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 14:09:02 +0200 Michael Mueller wrote: > >> @@ -224,6 +226,8 @@ struct subchannel *css_alloc_subchannel(struct subchannel_id schid, > >> INIT_WORK(&sch->todo_work, css_sch_todo); > >> sch->dev.release = &css_subchannel_release; > >> device_initialize(&sch->dev); > > > > It might be helpful to add a comment why you use 31 bit here... > > @Halil, please let me know what comment you prefere here... > How about? /* * The physical addresses of some the dma structures that * can belong to a subchannel need to fit 31 bit width (examples ccw,). */ > > > >> + sch->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(31); > >> + sch->dev.dma_mask = &sch->dev.coherent_dma_mask; > >> return sch; > >> > >> err: > >> @@ -899,6 +903,8 @@ static int __init setup_css(int nr) > >> dev_set_name(&css->device, "css%x", nr); > >> css->device.groups = cssdev_attr_groups; > >> css->device.release = channel_subsystem_release; > > > > ...and 64 bit here. > > and here. /* * We currently allocate notifier bits with this (using css->device * as the device argument with the DMA API), and are fine with 64 bit * addresses. */ Regards, Halil