From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36EE1C04AB5 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 17:29:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4B025FF8 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 17:29:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="rBmKAzm6" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729898AbfFCR3V (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jun 2019 13:29:21 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:52402 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727461AbfFCR3V (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jun 2019 13:29:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=E3YMznrQvI4XYCbxYdGQLQYRxZ6se0IICAJQI35QmUc=; b=rBmKAzm6VMFiVqBuypdPrNnHG 9qR/xC1YUSUo4q1ihLjn3I1k3Z3Zt6ifT4BOE9d8JuD+KANIIdW4jN8PXiVc/rtwsBx2jUqqiusN9 XZiJCQFveWwYCiDODxQrw3kCKKimNiQpVcsgEcblb0zsMWY+TexrkRomHsn0JqXwETKx9ELJfGj9q jOQlw3G/UlUJUPhW/UmsBMxDxE09/TlTcCGWjEEy2oiu1YHyvKMt+HBSMRmxLaLtbJMUdKbvkie5m R6xIoJDLFjnWEVIxBVl5q2n4wLYhS96OJs3nOLbuM/ziN5On8QOyJ8ynpVakg7HFTHIHdWMjvK7eX tMuk6CEhg==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hXqlo-00025Q-9C; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 17:29:16 +0000 Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 10:29:16 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Khalid Aziz Cc: Andrey Konovalov , Linux ARM , Linux Memory Management List , LKML , amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , Catalin Marinas , Vincenzo Frascino , Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , Andrew Morton , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kees Cook , Yishai Hadas , Felix Kuehling , Alexander Deucher , Christian Koenig , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Jens Wiklander , Alex Williamson , Leon Romanovsky , Luc Van Oostenryck , Dave Martin , enh , Jason Gunthorpe , Christoph Hellwig , Dmitry Vyukov , Kostya Serebryany , Evgeniy Stepanov , Lee Smith , Ramana Radhakrishnan , Jacob Bramley , Ruben Ayrapetyan , Robin Murphy , Kevin Brodsky , Szabolcs Nagy Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 01/16] uaccess: add untagged_addr definition for other arches Message-ID: <20190603172916.GA5390@infradead.org> References: <097bc300a5c6554ca6fd1886421bb2e0adb03420.1559580831.git.andreyknvl@google.com> <8ff5b0ff-849a-1e0b-18da-ccb5be85dd2b@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 11:24:35AM -0600, Khalid Aziz wrote: > On 6/3/19 11:06 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 7:04 PM Khalid Aziz wrote: > >> Andrey, > >> > >> This patch has now become part of the other patch series Chris Hellwig > >> has sent out - > >> . Can > >> you coordinate with that patch series? > > > > Hi! > > > > Yes, I've seen it. How should I coordinate? Rebase this series on top > > of that one? > > That would be one way to do it. Better yet, separate this patch from > both patch series, make it standalone and then rebase the two patch > series on top of it. I think easiest would be to just ask Linus if he could make an exception and include this trivial prep patch in 5.2-rc.