From: Eugene Korenevsky <ekorenevsky@gmail.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] kvm: vmx: fix limit checking in get_vmx_mem_address()
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 01:02:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190604220221.GA23558@dnote> (raw)
Intel SDM vol. 3, 5.3:
The processor causes a
general-protection exception (or, if the segment is SS, a stack-fault
exception) any time an attempt is made to access the following addresses
in a segment:
- A byte at an offset greater than the effective limit
- A word at an offset greater than the (effective-limit – 1)
- A doubleword at an offset greater than the (effective-limit – 3)
- A quadword at an offset greater than the (effective-limit – 7)
Therefore, the generic limit checking error condition must be
exn = off > limit + 1 - operand_len
but not
exn = off + operand_len > limit
as for now.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Korenevsky <ekorenevsky@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
index f1a69117ac0f..fef3d7031715 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
@@ -4115,7 +4115,7 @@ int get_vmx_mem_address(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long exit_qualification,
*/
if (!(s.base == 0 && s.limit == 0xffffffff &&
((s.type & 8) || !(s.type & 4))))
- exn = exn || (off + sizeof(u64) > s.limit);
+ exn = exn || (off > s.limit + 1 - sizeof(u64));
}
if (exn) {
kvm_queue_exception_e(vcpu,
--
2.21.0
next reply other threads:[~2019-06-04 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-04 22:02 Eugene Korenevsky [this message]
2019-06-05 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] kvm: vmx: fix limit checking in get_vmx_mem_address() Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190604220221.GA23558@dnote \
--to=ekorenevsky@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox