public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Eugene Korenevsky <ekorenevsky@gmail.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] kvm: vmx: fix limit checking in get_vmx_mem_address()
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 11:18:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190606181835.GH23169@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190605211739.GA21798@dnote>

On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 12:17:39AM +0300, Eugene Korenevsky wrote:
> Intel SDM vol. 3, 5.3:
> The processor causes a
> general-protection exception (or, if the segment is SS, a stack-fault
> exception) any time an attempt is made to access the following addresses
> in a segment:
> - A byte at an offset greater than the effective limit
> - A word at an offset greater than the (effective-limit – 1)
> - A doubleword at an offset greater than the (effective-limit – 3)
> - A quadword at an offset greater than the (effective-limit – 7)
> 
> Therefore, the generic limit checking error condition must be
> 
> exn = (off > limit + 1 - access_len) = (off + access_len - 1 > limit)
> 
> but not
> 
> exn = (off + access_len > limit)
> 
> as for now.
> 
> Also avoid integer overflow of `off` at 32-bit KVM by casting it to u64.
> 
> Note: access length is currently sizeof(u64) which is incorrect. This
> will be fixed in the subsequent patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eugene Korenevsky <ekorenevsky@gmail.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>

      reply	other threads:[~2019-06-06 18:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-05 21:17 [PATCH v4 1/2] kvm: vmx: fix limit checking in get_vmx_mem_address() Eugene Korenevsky
2019-06-06 18:18 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190606181835.GH23169@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=ekorenevsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox