public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	brijesh.singh@amd.com,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Rename need_emulation_on_page_fault() to handle_no_insn_on_page_fault()
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 08:48:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190716154855.GA1987@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190715203043.100483-3-liran.alon@oracle.com>

On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 11:30:43PM +0300, Liran Alon wrote:
> I think this name is more appropriate to what the x86_ops method does.
> In addition, modify VMX callback to return true as #PF handler can
> proceed to emulation in this case. This didn't result in a bug
> only because the callback is called when DecodeAssist is supported
> which is currently supported only on SVM.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 ++-
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c              | 2 +-
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm.c              | 4 ++--
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c          | 6 +++---
>  4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 450d69a1e6fa..536fd56f777d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1201,7 +1201,8 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
>  				   uint16_t *vmcs_version);
>  	uint16_t (*nested_get_evmcs_version)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  
> -	bool (*need_emulation_on_page_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +	/* Returns true if #PF handler can proceed to emulation */
> +	bool (*handle_no_insn_on_page_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);

The problem with this name is that it requires a comment to explain the
boolean return value.  The VMX implementation particular would be
inscrutuable.

"no insn" is also a misnomer, as the AMD quirk has an insn, it's the
insn_len that's missing.

What about something like force_emulation_on_zero_len_insn()?

>  };
>  
>  struct kvm_arch_async_pf {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index 1e9ba81accba..889de3ccf655 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -5423,7 +5423,7 @@ int kvm_mmu_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t cr2, u64 error_code,
>  	 * guest, with the exception of AMD Erratum 1096 which is unrecoverable.
>  	 */
>  	if (unlikely(insn && !insn_len)) {
> -		if (!kvm_x86_ops->need_emulation_on_page_fault(vcpu))
> +		if (!kvm_x86_ops->handle_no_insn_on_page_fault(vcpu))
>  			return 1;
>  	}
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index 79023a41f7a7..ab89bb0de8df 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -7118,7 +7118,7 @@ static int nested_enable_evmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	return -ENODEV;
>  }
>  
> -static bool svm_need_emulation_on_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +static bool svm_handle_no_insn_on_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	bool is_user, smap;
>  
> @@ -7291,7 +7291,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __ro_after_init = {
>  	.nested_enable_evmcs = nested_enable_evmcs,
>  	.nested_get_evmcs_version = nested_get_evmcs_version,
>  
> -	.need_emulation_on_page_fault = svm_need_emulation_on_page_fault,
> +	.handle_no_insn_on_page_fault = svm_handle_no_insn_on_page_fault,
>  };
>  
>  static int __init svm_init(void)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index f64bcbb03906..088fc6d943e9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -7419,9 +7419,9 @@ static int enable_smi_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static bool vmx_need_emulation_on_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +static bool vmx_handle_no_insn_on_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> -	return 0;
> +	return true;

Any functional change here should be done in a different patch.

Given that we should never reach this point on VMX, a WARN and triple
fault request seems in order.

	WARN_ON_ONCE(1);

	kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TRIPLE_FAULT, vcpu);
	return false;

>  }
>  
>  static __init int hardware_setup(void)
> @@ -7726,7 +7726,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops __ro_after_init = {
>  	.set_nested_state = NULL,
>  	.get_vmcs12_pages = NULL,
>  	.nested_enable_evmcs = NULL,
> -	.need_emulation_on_page_fault = vmx_need_emulation_on_page_fault,
> +	.handle_no_insn_on_page_fault = vmx_handle_no_insn_on_page_fault,
>  };
>  
>  static void vmx_cleanup_l1d_flush(void)
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-16 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-15 20:30 KVM: SVM: Fix workaround for AMD Errata 1096 Liran Alon
2019-07-15 20:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Liran Alon
2019-07-16 15:48   ` Singh, Brijesh
2019-07-16 15:56     ` Liran Alon
2019-07-16 16:07       ` Liran Alon
2019-07-16 16:10       ` Singh, Brijesh
2019-07-16 16:20         ` Liran Alon
2019-07-16 16:41           ` Sean Christopherson
2019-07-16 16:56             ` Liran Alon
2019-07-16 17:27               ` Sean Christopherson
2019-07-16 17:27               ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-16 17:35                 ` Liran Alon
2019-07-16 19:28                   ` Singh, Brijesh
2019-07-16 19:34                     ` Liran Alon
2019-07-16 19:39                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-16 19:45                         ` Sean Christopherson
2019-07-16 19:50                           ` Liran Alon
2019-07-16 19:47                         ` Liran Alon
2019-07-16 19:41                       ` Sean Christopherson
2019-07-16 19:52                         ` Liran Alon
2019-07-16 20:02                       ` Singh, Brijesh
2019-07-16 20:07                         ` Sean Christopherson
2019-07-16 20:13                           ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-16 20:09                         ` Liran Alon
2019-07-16 20:27                           ` Singh, Brijesh
2019-07-16 20:54                             ` Sean Christopherson
2019-07-16 21:53                               ` Liran Alon
2019-07-16 18:05           ` Singh, Brijesh
2019-07-16 18:06             ` Singh, Brijesh
2019-07-15 20:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Rename need_emulation_on_page_fault() to handle_no_insn_on_page_fault() Liran Alon
2019-07-16 15:48   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2019-07-16 16:01     ` Liran Alon
2019-07-16 16:10       ` Sean Christopherson
2019-07-16 19:33         ` Singh, Brijesh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190716154855.GA1987@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox