From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
brijesh.singh@amd.com,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Rename need_emulation_on_page_fault() to handle_no_insn_on_page_fault()
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 08:48:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190716154855.GA1987@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190715203043.100483-3-liran.alon@oracle.com>
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 11:30:43PM +0300, Liran Alon wrote:
> I think this name is more appropriate to what the x86_ops method does.
> In addition, modify VMX callback to return true as #PF handler can
> proceed to emulation in this case. This didn't result in a bug
> only because the callback is called when DecodeAssist is supported
> which is currently supported only on SVM.
>
> Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 ++-
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 4 ++--
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 6 +++---
> 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 450d69a1e6fa..536fd56f777d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1201,7 +1201,8 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
> uint16_t *vmcs_version);
> uint16_t (*nested_get_evmcs_version)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>
> - bool (*need_emulation_on_page_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> + /* Returns true if #PF handler can proceed to emulation */
> + bool (*handle_no_insn_on_page_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
The problem with this name is that it requires a comment to explain the
boolean return value. The VMX implementation particular would be
inscrutuable.
"no insn" is also a misnomer, as the AMD quirk has an insn, it's the
insn_len that's missing.
What about something like force_emulation_on_zero_len_insn()?
> };
>
> struct kvm_arch_async_pf {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index 1e9ba81accba..889de3ccf655 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -5423,7 +5423,7 @@ int kvm_mmu_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t cr2, u64 error_code,
> * guest, with the exception of AMD Erratum 1096 which is unrecoverable.
> */
> if (unlikely(insn && !insn_len)) {
> - if (!kvm_x86_ops->need_emulation_on_page_fault(vcpu))
> + if (!kvm_x86_ops->handle_no_insn_on_page_fault(vcpu))
> return 1;
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index 79023a41f7a7..ab89bb0de8df 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -7118,7 +7118,7 @@ static int nested_enable_evmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> -static bool svm_need_emulation_on_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +static bool svm_handle_no_insn_on_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> bool is_user, smap;
>
> @@ -7291,7 +7291,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __ro_after_init = {
> .nested_enable_evmcs = nested_enable_evmcs,
> .nested_get_evmcs_version = nested_get_evmcs_version,
>
> - .need_emulation_on_page_fault = svm_need_emulation_on_page_fault,
> + .handle_no_insn_on_page_fault = svm_handle_no_insn_on_page_fault,
> };
>
> static int __init svm_init(void)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index f64bcbb03906..088fc6d943e9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -7419,9 +7419,9 @@ static int enable_smi_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static bool vmx_need_emulation_on_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +static bool vmx_handle_no_insn_on_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - return 0;
> + return true;
Any functional change here should be done in a different patch.
Given that we should never reach this point on VMX, a WARN and triple
fault request seems in order.
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TRIPLE_FAULT, vcpu);
return false;
> }
>
> static __init int hardware_setup(void)
> @@ -7726,7 +7726,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops __ro_after_init = {
> .set_nested_state = NULL,
> .get_vmcs12_pages = NULL,
> .nested_enable_evmcs = NULL,
> - .need_emulation_on_page_fault = vmx_need_emulation_on_page_fault,
> + .handle_no_insn_on_page_fault = vmx_handle_no_insn_on_page_fault,
> };
>
> static void vmx_cleanup_l1d_flush(void)
> --
> 2.20.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-16 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-15 20:30 KVM: SVM: Fix workaround for AMD Errata 1096 Liran Alon
2019-07-15 20:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Liran Alon
2019-07-16 15:48 ` Singh, Brijesh
2019-07-16 15:56 ` Liran Alon
2019-07-16 16:07 ` Liran Alon
2019-07-16 16:10 ` Singh, Brijesh
2019-07-16 16:20 ` Liran Alon
2019-07-16 16:41 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-07-16 16:56 ` Liran Alon
2019-07-16 17:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-07-16 17:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-16 17:35 ` Liran Alon
2019-07-16 19:28 ` Singh, Brijesh
2019-07-16 19:34 ` Liran Alon
2019-07-16 19:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-16 19:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-07-16 19:50 ` Liran Alon
2019-07-16 19:47 ` Liran Alon
2019-07-16 19:41 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-07-16 19:52 ` Liran Alon
2019-07-16 20:02 ` Singh, Brijesh
2019-07-16 20:07 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-07-16 20:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-16 20:09 ` Liran Alon
2019-07-16 20:27 ` Singh, Brijesh
2019-07-16 20:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-07-16 21:53 ` Liran Alon
2019-07-16 18:05 ` Singh, Brijesh
2019-07-16 18:06 ` Singh, Brijesh
2019-07-15 20:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Rename need_emulation_on_page_fault() to handle_no_insn_on_page_fault() Liran Alon
2019-07-16 15:48 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2019-07-16 16:01 ` Liran Alon
2019-07-16 16:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-07-16 19:33 ` Singh, Brijesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190716154855.GA1987@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox