From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D73FC7618B for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:32:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F13C2223A1 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:32:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732005AbfGWMch (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:32:37 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:52706 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726438AbfGWMcg (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:32:36 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x6NCSMev162045 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:32:35 -0400 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2tx14skhmw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:32:35 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:32:32 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:32:29 +0100 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x6NCWSEu59703370 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:32:28 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E418D11C054; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:32:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC5811C052; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:32:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc2783563651 (unknown [9.152.224.145]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:32:27 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 14:32:26 +0200 From: Halil Pasic To: Heiko Carstens Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Vasily Gorbik , Petr Tesarik , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] s390/dma: provide proper ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS value In-Reply-To: <20190719130130.3ef4fa9c.pasic@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190718172120.69947-1-pasic@linux.ibm.com> <20190719063249.GA4852@osiris> <20190719130130.3ef4fa9c.pasic@linux.ibm.com> Organization: IBM X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19072312-4275-0000-0000-0000034FD5FC X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19072312-4276-0000-0000-0000385FFAD5 Message-Id: <20190723143226.6d929d7a.pasic@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-07-23_05:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=887 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1907230123 Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 13:01:30 +0200 Halil Pasic wrote: > > > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h > > > index 6f26f35d4a71..3b0329665b13 100644 > > > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h > > > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h > > > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ > > > * by the 31 bit heritage. > > > */ > > > #define MAX_DMA_ADDRESS 0x80000000 > > > +#define ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS 31 > > > > powerpc has this in arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h. This really > > should be consistently defined in the same header file across > > architectures. > > > > Christoph, what is the preferred header file for this definition? ping Christoph could you please answer Heiko's question, so I can do my respin. Regards, Halil > > > > I'd also rather say it would be better to move the #ifndef ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS > > check to a common code header file instead of having it in a C file, and > > make it more obvious in which header file architectures should/can override > > the default, no? > > +1 > > I will wait for Christoph's answer with a respin. Thanks for having a > look.