From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94EEAC76186 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 02:13:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71FD12064C for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 02:13:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729020AbfG3CM5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jul 2019 22:12:57 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f195.google.com ([209.85.210.195]:34845 "EHLO mail-pf1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727539AbfG3CM5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jul 2019 22:12:57 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f195.google.com with SMTP id u14so28994562pfn.2 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 19:12:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=QzmpkA05z0mtZkoyWxRVkvigio3In7Q7o/LhFUGd8xY=; b=YRhglCJymZrY8iT1doc6spl2hKA6RQCSyKJCsZsY4fz7WRawpiz2LbEZ5SauGDfBIa V+b3x6pSlWNKRxUOAXjTXWUGeYHhMePNWeXsilSXIX5V4IsKc5D69NE1AUoY/4CYLSZz jINP9al2YCJ8ArFLdeKC8h8o4eiEsobKj7lR0K8XXYyOBKuwVHIEqZwyMAd8Rk9buMvE NQefMfJYp3OwSJmFETnFviP9bsucePdZqbL14RA3MU7mvUHmhpBhFBI6lp50WbvfB7HM 2sP8lM+ncf8+pmxbuuRLIVYj+/5Xnf9Jmqsn5ZXo5hC5BMroakhseu/yi9CA3/3LxeAM tdAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUZ1mVXqoXnpervSRsXbBrtq9ggTmMcS6KmXuoVO4CEeGUfhMRu /PNsDk0qPWAeq4l/KYNdXMkS+g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxqSPlxO76Ij2A1mHHbdVXJDnXXam4LtLjVK/hASFOyLe7TNpE4nQ1nPmvpEvJtjISmlOwYRw== X-Received: by 2002:a62:ae02:: with SMTP id q2mr38616550pff.1.1564452776311; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 19:12:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xz-x1 ([209.132.188.80]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o11sm103447207pfh.114.2019.07.29.19.12.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 29 Jul 2019 19:12:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:12:45 +0800 From: Peter Xu To: Sean Christopherson Cc: Peter Xu , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: X86: Tune PLE Window tracepoint Message-ID: <20190730021245.GE19232@xz-x1> References: <20190729053243.9224-1-peterx@redhat.com> <20190729053243.9224-4-peterx@redhat.com> <20190729162338.GE21120@linux.intel.com> <20190730014339.GC19232@xz-x1> <20190730020607.GJ21120@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190730020607.GJ21120@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 07:06:07PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > > > > index d98eac371c0a..cc1f98130e6a 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > > > > @@ -5214,7 +5214,7 @@ static void grow_ple_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > > > if (vmx->ple_window != old) > > > > vmx->ple_window_dirty = true; > > > > > > > > - trace_kvm_ple_window_grow(vcpu->vcpu_id, vmx->ple_window, old); > > > > + trace_kvm_ple_window_changed(vcpu->vcpu_id, vmx->ple_window, old); > > > > > > No need for the macro, the snippet right about already checks 'new != old'. > > > Though I do like the rename, i.e. rename the trace function to > > > trace_kvm_ple_window_changed(). > > > > Do you mean this one? > > > > if (vmx->ple_window != old) > > vmx->ple_window_dirty = true; > > Yep. > > > It didn't return, did it? :) > > You lost me. What's wrong with: > > if (vmx->ple_window != old) { > vmx->ple_window_dirty = true; > trace_kvm_ple_window_update(vcpu->vcpu_id, vmx_ple->window, old); > } Yes this looks fine to me. I'll switch. Regards, -- Peter Xu