From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"Jim Mattson" <jmattson@google.com>,
"Sean Christopherson" <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 7/7] x86: KVM: svm: eliminate hardcoded RIP advancement from vmrun_interception()
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 19:30:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190808173051.6359-8-vkuznets@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190808173051.6359-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
Just like we do with other intercepts, in vmrun_interception() we should be
doing kvm_skip_emulated_instruction() and not just RIP += 3. Also, it is
wrong to increment RIP before nested_svm_vmrun() as it can result in
kvm_inject_gp().
We can't call kvm_skip_emulated_instruction() after nested_svm_vmrun() so
move it inside. To preserve the return value from it nested_svm_vmrun()
needs to start returning an int.
Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 27 ++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index 43bc4a5e4948..6c4046eb26b3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -3586,9 +3586,9 @@ static void enter_svm_guest_mode(struct vcpu_svm *svm, u64 vmcb_gpa,
mark_all_dirty(svm->vmcb);
}
-static bool nested_svm_vmrun(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
+static int nested_svm_vmrun(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
{
- int rc;
+ int rc, ret;
struct vmcb *nested_vmcb;
struct vmcb *hsave = svm->nested.hsave;
struct vmcb *vmcb = svm->vmcb;
@@ -3598,12 +3598,15 @@ static bool nested_svm_vmrun(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
vmcb_gpa = svm->vmcb->save.rax;
rc = kvm_vcpu_map(&svm->vcpu, gpa_to_gfn(vmcb_gpa), &map);
- if (rc) {
- if (rc == -EINVAL)
- kvm_inject_gp(&svm->vcpu, 0);
- return false;
+ if (rc == -EINVAL) {
+ kvm_inject_gp(&svm->vcpu, 0);
+ return 1;
}
+ ret = kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(&svm->vcpu);
+ if (rc)
+ return ret;
+
nested_vmcb = map.hva;
if (!nested_vmcb_checks(nested_vmcb)) {
@@ -3614,7 +3617,7 @@ static bool nested_svm_vmrun(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
kvm_vcpu_unmap(&svm->vcpu, &map, true);
- return false;
+ return ret;
}
trace_kvm_nested_vmrun(svm->vmcb->save.rip, vmcb_gpa,
@@ -3667,7 +3670,7 @@ static bool nested_svm_vmrun(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
nested_svm_vmexit(svm);
}
- return true;
+ return ret;
}
static void nested_svm_vmloadsave(struct vmcb *from_vmcb, struct vmcb *to_vmcb)
@@ -3743,13 +3746,7 @@ static int vmrun_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
if (nested_svm_check_permissions(svm))
return 1;
- /* Save rip after vmrun instruction */
- kvm_rip_write(&svm->vcpu, kvm_rip_read(&svm->vcpu) + 3);
-
- if (!nested_svm_vmrun(svm))
- return 1;
-
- return 1;
+ return nested_svm_vmrun(svm);
}
static int stgi_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-08 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-08 17:30 [PATCH v3 0/7] x86: KVM: svm: get rid of hardcoded instructions lengths Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-08-08 17:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] x86: KVM: svm: don't pretend to advance RIP in case wrmsr_interception() results in #GP Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-08-08 17:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] x86: kvm: svm: propagate errors from skip_emulated_instruction() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-08-09 18:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-08 17:30 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] x86: KVM: clear interrupt shadow on EMULTYPE_SKIP Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-08-08 17:30 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] x86: KVM: add xsetbv to the emulator Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-08-08 17:30 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] x86: KVM: svm: remove hardcoded instruction length from intercepts Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-08-09 18:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-08 17:30 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] x86: KVM: svm: eliminate weird goto from vmrun_interception() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-08-09 18:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-08 17:30 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2019-08-09 18:55 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] x86: KVM: svm: eliminate hardcoded RIP advancement " Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190808173051.6359-8-vkuznets@redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox