From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Cc: "Krish Sadhukhan" <krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com>,
"kvm list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: nVMX: Check GUEST_DR7 on vmentry of nested guests
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 09:58:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190904165803.GE24079@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALMp9eTObQkBrKpN-e=ejD8E5w3WpbcNkXt2gJ46xboYwR+b7Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 09:44:58AM -0700, Jim Mattson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 5:59 PM Krish Sadhukhan
> <krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com> wrote:
> > Is it OK to keep this Guest check in software for now and then remove it
> > once we have a solution in place ?
>
> Why do you feel that getting the priority correct is so important for
> this one check in particular? I'd be surprised if any hypervisor ever
> assembled a VMCS that failed this check.
Agreed. I don't see much value in adding a subset of guest state checks,
and adding every check will be painfully slow. IMO we're better off
finding a solution that allows deferring guest state checks to hardware.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-04 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-29 20:56 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: nVMX: Check GUEST_DEBUGCTL and GUEST_DR7 on vmentry of nested guests Krish Sadhukhan
2019-08-29 20:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: nVMX: Check GUEST_DEBUGCTL " Krish Sadhukhan
2019-08-29 22:12 ` Jim Mattson
2019-08-30 23:26 ` Krish Sadhukhan
2019-09-01 23:55 ` Jim Mattson
2019-08-29 20:56 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: nVMX: Check GUEST_DR7 " Krish Sadhukhan
2019-08-29 22:26 ` Jim Mattson
2019-08-30 23:07 ` Krish Sadhukhan
2019-08-30 23:15 ` Jim Mattson
2019-09-02 0:33 ` Jim Mattson
[not found] ` <e229bea2-acb2-e268-6281-d8e467c3282e@oracle.com>
2019-09-04 16:44 ` Jim Mattson
2019-09-04 16:58 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2019-09-04 18:05 ` Krish Sadhukhan
2019-09-04 18:20 ` Jim Mattson
2019-09-09 4:11 ` Krish Sadhukhan
2019-09-09 15:56 ` Jim Mattson
2019-09-04 17:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-12-20 23:45 ` Jim Mattson
2019-12-21 0:27 ` Jim Mattson
2019-08-29 20:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] kvm-unit-test: nVMX: __enter_guest() should not set "launched" state when VM-entry fails Krish Sadhukhan
2019-09-04 15:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-09-13 20:37 ` Krish Sadhukhan
2019-09-13 21:06 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-09-16 19:12 ` Krish Sadhukhan
2019-08-29 20:56 ` [PATCH 4/4] kvm-unit-test: nVMX: Check GUEST_DEBUGCTL and GUEST_DR7 on vmentry of nested guests Krish Sadhukhan
2019-08-29 23:17 ` Jim Mattson
2019-08-30 1:12 ` Nadav Amit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190904165803.GE24079@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).