public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
	Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: X86: Trace vcpu_id for vmexit
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 08:56:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190905155654.GA29019@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190905021515.GD31707@xz-x1>

On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 10:15:15AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 10:26:58AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 06:34:56PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > Tracing the ID helps to pair vmenters and vmexits for guests with
> > > multiple vCPUs.
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/x86/kvm/trace.h | 5 ++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/trace.h b/arch/x86/kvm/trace.h
> > > index b5c831e79094..c682f3f7f998 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/trace.h
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/trace.h
> > > @@ -232,17 +232,20 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kvm_exit,
> > >  		__field(	u32,	        isa             )
> > >  		__field(	u64,	        info1           )
> > >  		__field(	u64,	        info2           )
> > > +		__field(	int,	        vcpu_id         )
> > 
> > It doesn't actually affect anything, but vcpu_id is stored and printed as
> > an 'unsigned int' everywhere else in the trace code.  Stylistically I like
> > that approach even though struct kvm_vcpu holds it as a signed int.
> 
> True.  I can switch to unsigned int to get aligned with the rest if
> there's other comment to address.  Though from codebase-wise I would
> even prefer signed because it gives us a chance to set an invalid vcpu
> id (-1) where necessary, or notice something severly wrong when <-1.

I agree that a signed int makes sense for flows like kvm_get_vcpu_by_id(),
where the incoming id isn't sanitized.  But for struct kvm_vcpu, a negative 
vcpu_id is simply impossible, e.g. vcpu_id is set to a postive (and capped)
value as part of the core vcpu initialization and is never changed.  I
prefer storing an unsigned val in the tracing as it communicates that
vcpu_id is always valid.  I suspect struct kvm_vcpu uses a signed int
purely to avoid having to constantly cast it to an int.

> After all it should far cover our usage (IIUC max vcpu id should be
> 512 cross archs).

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-05 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-15 10:34 [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: X86: Some tracepoint enhancements Peter Xu
2019-08-15 10:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: X86: Trace vcpu_id for vmexit Peter Xu
2019-09-04 17:26   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-09-05  2:15     ` Peter Xu
2019-09-05 15:56       ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2019-08-15 10:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: X86: Remove tailing newline for tracepoints Peter Xu
2019-09-04 17:27   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-15 10:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: X86: Tune PLE Window tracepoint Peter Xu
2019-09-04 17:32   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-09-05  2:25     ` Peter Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190905155654.GA29019@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox