From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D78C4740A for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 12:16:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE85206A5 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 12:16:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2404772AbfIIMQB (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Sep 2019 08:16:01 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38002 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2391099AbfIIMQB (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Sep 2019 08:16:01 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f200.google.com (mail-qk1-f200.google.com [209.85.222.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04D4646288 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 12:16:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk1-f200.google.com with SMTP id b67so16070164qkc.1 for ; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 05:16:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=cR0iPk7k3gak2smW+VGCzi1D6+WqwWLkfLqRmEk+oQ0=; b=cqH7xZLjbBB7G+84+yd+9wELGSbl0gZ/UUdpenVnsEFXMij+qXYcPDpPaDjdVgL7Lq zf626EvPwmi+qnWHhOZO/2YvLCyOXF1/5uYWMDiIeWlxn/xGfNpCpDWQPRP72itncctb eZlmNTChNdIaOvDLhC2HRqRPdgp9kA0JNze/Mu3G8cw8pVVz5gnfDveFpS9Y3r+ZUl4Y CBdchnEV1ddVpJzwJhmoMyoWJqmkE2GvGFQdjUVwTdEd7ZfUO6S3nfto+eWgr/6OjpF9 TOAaeAoFS/3cJ9Mt3b7p5qgTSaTg2j81KNAZh5FrnPdGrDf7rFRGgfAqxxWbbmdkzTg7 L3tQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUGzWuScNgsdAeZq42UK/Td40M9cUCZVnV+eeavbf3XSoRSBjZ/ CFBy7ahfxdABrnqWH9bEDYwzwSvHSbwpq7jasDSQdRMEBg+QVG1OCvuUpRDdj82pQfxhfE74C4R ifamikXoQpiRa X-Received: by 2002:aed:3527:: with SMTP id a36mr23116289qte.82.1568031360369; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 05:16:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwTjEC9gLktIgrr/FKS4EvJdW8yr2QsPhfhm1/EGltRDxNNwBhSFB09DwZLmFGxdw8mqFXn1g== X-Received: by 2002:aed:3527:: with SMTP id a36mr23116262qte.82.1568031360138; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 05:16:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com ([80.74.107.118]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g194sm7059848qke.46.2019.09.09.05.15.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 09 Sep 2019 05:15:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 08:15:52 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Jason Wang Cc: David Miller , jgg@mellanox.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aarcange@redhat.com, jglisse@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert and rework on the metadata accelreation Message-ID: <20190909081537-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20190905122736.19768-1-jasowang@redhat.com> <20190905135907.GB6011@mellanox.com> <7785d39b-b4e7-8165-516c-ee6a08ac9c4e@redhat.com> <20190906.151505.1486178691190611604.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 03:18:01PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2019/9/6 下午9:15, David Miller wrote: > > From: Jason Wang > > Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 18:02:35 +0800 > > > > > On 2019/9/5 下午9:59, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > > I think you should apply the revert this cycle and rebase the other > > > > patch for next.. > > > > > > > > Jason > > > Yes, the plan is to revert in this release cycle. > > Then you should reset patch #1 all by itself targetting 'net'. > > > Thanks for the reminding. I want the patch to go through Michael's vhost > tree, that's why I don't put 'net' prefix. For next time, maybe I can use > "vhost" as a prefix for classification? That's fine by me. -- MST