From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] x86: remove memory constraint from "mov" instruction
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:08:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190911190840.GG1045@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGG=3QWteHe8zCdXQVQv+42pMO2k4XvAbj_A=ptRUi9E2AwT2w@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 02:19:20PM -0700, Bill Wendling wrote:
> The "mov" instruction to get the error code shouldn't move into a memory
> location. Don't allow the compiler to make this decision. Instead
> specify that only a register is appropriate here.
I'd prefer the changelog to say something like:
Remove a bogus memory contraint as x86 does not have a generic
memory-to-memory "mov" instruction.
Saying "shouldn't move into a memory location" makes it sound like there's
an unwanted side effect when the compiler selects memory, though I suppose
you could argue that a build error is an unwanted side effect :-).
Out of curiosity, do any compilers actually generate errors because of
this, or is it simply dead code?
>
> Signed-off-by: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
> ---
> lib/x86/desc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/x86/desc.c b/lib/x86/desc.c
> index 5f37cef..451f504 100644
> --- a/lib/x86/desc.c
> +++ b/lib/x86/desc.c
> @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ unsigned exception_error_code(void)
> {
> unsigned short error_code;
>
> - asm("mov %%gs:6, %0" : "=rm"(error_code));
> + asm("mov %%gs:6, %0" : "=r"(error_code));
> return error_code;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-11 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-09 21:19 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] x86: remove memory constraint from "mov" instruction Bill Wendling
2019-09-10 16:44 ` Jim Mattson
2019-09-11 19:08 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2019-09-11 22:35 ` Bill Wendling
2019-09-12 20:59 ` [PATCH] " Bill Wendling
2019-09-19 21:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-09-24 14:02 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] " Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190911190840.GG1045@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox