From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PULL 05/17] s390x: Add diag308 subcode 0 testing
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:37:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190925163714.27519-6-thuth@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190925163714.27519-1-thuth@redhat.com>
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
By adding a load reset routine to cstart.S we can also test the clear
reset done by subcode 0, as we now can restore our registers again.
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190826163502.1298-6-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
s390x/cstart64.S | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
s390x/diag308.c | 31 ++++++++++---------------------
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/s390x/cstart64.S b/s390x/cstart64.S
index dedfe80..36f7cab 100644
--- a/s390x/cstart64.S
+++ b/s390x/cstart64.S
@@ -145,6 +145,33 @@ memsetxc:
.endm
.section .text
+/*
+ * load_reset calling convention:
+ * %r2 subcode (0 or 1)
+ */
+.globl diag308_load_reset
+diag308_load_reset:
+ SAVE_REGS
+ /* Save the first PSW word to the IPL PSW */
+ epsw %r0, %r1
+ st %r0, 0
+ /* Store the address and the bit for 31 bit addressing */
+ larl %r0, 0f
+ oilh %r0, 0x8000
+ st %r0, 0x4
+ /* Do the reset */
+ diag %r0,%r2,0x308
+ /* Failure path */
+ xgr %r2, %r2
+ br %r14
+ /* Success path */
+ /* We lost cr0 due to the reset */
+0: larl %r1, initial_cr0
+ lctlg %c0, %c0, 0(%r1)
+ RESTORE_REGS
+ lhi %r2, 1
+ br %r14
+
pgm_int:
SAVE_REGS
brasl %r14, handle_pgm_int
diff --git a/s390x/diag308.c b/s390x/diag308.c
index f085b1a..6b4ffa6 100644
--- a/s390x/diag308.c
+++ b/s390x/diag308.c
@@ -21,32 +21,20 @@ static void test_priv(void)
check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PRIVILEGED_OPERATION);
}
+
/*
- * Check that diag308 with subcode 1 loads the PSW at address 0, i.e.
+ * Check that diag308 with subcode 0 and 1 loads the PSW at address 0, i.e.
* that we can put a pointer into address 4 which then gets executed.
*/
+extern int diag308_load_reset(u64);
+static void test_subcode0(void)
+{
+ report("load modified clear done", diag308_load_reset(0));
+}
+
static void test_subcode1(void)
{
- uint64_t saved_psw = *(uint64_t *)0;
- long subcode = 1;
- long ret, tmp;
-
- asm volatile (
- " epsw %0,%1\n"
- " st %0,0\n"
- " larl %0,0f\n"
- " oilh %0,0x8000\n"
- " st %0,4\n"
- " diag 0,%2,0x308\n"
- " lghi %0,0\n"
- " j 1f\n"
- "0: lghi %0,1\n"
- "1:"
- : "=&d"(ret), "=&d"(tmp) : "d"(subcode) : "memory");
-
- *(uint64_t *)0 = saved_psw;
-
- report("load normal reset done", ret == 1);
+ report("load normal reset done", diag308_load_reset(1));
}
/* Expect a specification exception when using an uneven register */
@@ -107,6 +95,7 @@ static struct {
void (*func)(void);
} tests[] = {
{ "privileged", test_priv },
+ { "subcode 0", test_subcode0 },
{ "subcode 1", test_subcode1 },
{ "subcode 5", test_subcode5 },
{ "subcode 6", test_subcode6 },
--
2.18.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-25 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-25 16:36 [kvm-unit-tests PULL 00/17] New s390x kvm-unit-tests and some fixes Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:36 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 01/17] s390x: Support PSW restart boot Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:36 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 02/17] s390x: Diag288 test Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 03/17] s390x: Move stsi to library Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 04/17] s390x: STSI tests Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 06/17] s390x: Move pfmf to lib and make address void Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 07/17] s390x: Storage key library functions now take void ptr addresses Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 08/17] s390x: Bump march to zEC12 Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 09/17] s390x: Add storage key removal facility Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 10/17] s390x: Fix stsi unaligned test and add selector tests Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 11/17] s390x: Use interrupts in SCLP and add locking Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 12/17] s390x: Add linemode console Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 13/17] s390x: Add linemode buffer to fix newline on every print Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 14/17] s390x: Add initial smp code Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 15/17] s390x: Prepare for external calls Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 16/17] s390x: SMP test Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 17/17] s390x: Free allocated page in iep test Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:39 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 00/17] New s390x kvm-unit-tests and some fixes Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190925163714.27519-6-thuth@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox