From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PULL 07/17] s390x: Storage key library functions now take void ptr addresses
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:37:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190925163714.27519-8-thuth@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190925163714.27519-1-thuth@redhat.com>
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Now all mem.h functions are consistent in how they take a memory
address. Also we have less casting in the future.
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190828113615.4769-3-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
lib/s390x/asm/mem.h | 9 +++------
s390x/pfmf.c | 4 ++--
s390x/skey.c | 24 +++++++++++-------------
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/mem.h b/lib/s390x/asm/mem.h
index 9b8fd70..c78bfa2 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/asm/mem.h
+++ b/lib/s390x/asm/mem.h
@@ -26,9 +26,7 @@ union skey {
uint8_t val;
};
-static inline void set_storage_key(unsigned long addr,
- unsigned char skey,
- int nq)
+static inline void set_storage_key(void *addr, unsigned char skey, int nq)
{
if (nq)
asm volatile(".insn rrf,0xb22b0000,%0,%1,8,0"
@@ -37,8 +35,7 @@ static inline void set_storage_key(unsigned long addr,
asm volatile("sske %0,%1" : : "d" (skey), "a" (addr));
}
-static inline unsigned long set_storage_key_mb(unsigned long addr,
- unsigned char skey)
+static inline void *set_storage_key_mb(void *addr, unsigned char skey)
{
assert(test_facility(8));
@@ -47,7 +44,7 @@ static inline unsigned long set_storage_key_mb(unsigned long addr,
return addr;
}
-static inline unsigned char get_storage_key(unsigned long addr)
+static inline unsigned char get_storage_key(void *addr)
{
unsigned char skey;
diff --git a/s390x/pfmf.c b/s390x/pfmf.c
index 9986624..0b3e70b 100644
--- a/s390x/pfmf.c
+++ b/s390x/pfmf.c
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static void test_4k_key(void)
r1.reg.fsc = PFMF_FSC_4K;
r1.reg.key = 0x30;
pfmf(r1.val, pagebuf);
- skey.val = get_storage_key((unsigned long) pagebuf);
+ skey.val = get_storage_key(pagebuf);
skey.val &= SKEY_ACC | SKEY_FP;
report("set storage keys", skey.val == 0x30);
report_prefix_pop();
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static void test_1m_key(void)
r1.reg.key = 0x30;
pfmf(r1.val, pagebuf);
for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
- skey.val = get_storage_key((unsigned long) pagebuf + i * PAGE_SIZE);
+ skey.val = get_storage_key(pagebuf + i * PAGE_SIZE);
skey.val &= SKEY_ACC | SKEY_FP;
if (skey.val != 0x30) {
rp = false;
diff --git a/s390x/skey.c b/s390x/skey.c
index fd4fcc7..efc4eca 100644
--- a/s390x/skey.c
+++ b/s390x/skey.c
@@ -18,14 +18,12 @@
static uint8_t pagebuf[PAGE_SIZE * 2] __attribute__((aligned(PAGE_SIZE * 2)));
-const unsigned long page0 = (unsigned long)pagebuf;
-const unsigned long page1 = (unsigned long)(pagebuf + PAGE_SIZE);
static void test_set_mb(void)
{
union skey skey, ret1, ret2;
- unsigned long addr = 0x10000 - 2 * PAGE_SIZE;
- unsigned long end = 0x10000;
+ void *addr = (void *)0x10000 - 2 * PAGE_SIZE;
+ void *end = (void *)0x10000;
/* Multi block support came with EDAT 1 */
if (!test_facility(8))
@@ -46,10 +44,10 @@ static void test_chg(void)
union skey skey1, skey2;
skey1.val = 0x30;
- set_storage_key(page0, skey1.val, 0);
- skey1.val = get_storage_key(page0);
+ set_storage_key(pagebuf, skey1.val, 0);
+ skey1.val = get_storage_key(pagebuf);
pagebuf[0] = 3;
- skey2.val = get_storage_key(page0);
+ skey2.val = get_storage_key(pagebuf);
report("chg bit test", !skey1.str.ch && skey2.str.ch);
}
@@ -58,9 +56,9 @@ static void test_set(void)
union skey skey, ret;
skey.val = 0x30;
- ret.val = get_storage_key(page0);
- set_storage_key(page0, skey.val, 0);
- ret.val = get_storage_key(page0);
+ ret.val = get_storage_key(pagebuf);
+ set_storage_key(pagebuf, skey.val, 0);
+ ret.val = get_storage_key(pagebuf);
/*
* For all set tests we only test the ACC and FP bits. RF and
* CH are set by the machine for memory references and changes
@@ -103,11 +101,11 @@ static void test_priv(void)
report_prefix_push("sske");
expect_pgm_int();
enter_pstate();
- set_storage_key(page0, 0x30, 0);
+ set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x30, 0);
check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PRIVILEGED_OPERATION);
report_prefix_pop();
- skey.val = get_storage_key(page0);
+ skey.val = get_storage_key(pagebuf);
report("skey did not change on exception", skey.str.acc != 3);
report_prefix_push("iske");
@@ -117,7 +115,7 @@ static void test_priv(void)
} else {
expect_pgm_int();
enter_pstate();
- get_storage_key(page0);
+ get_storage_key(pagebuf);
check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PRIVILEGED_OPERATION);
}
report_prefix_pop();
--
2.18.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-25 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-25 16:36 [kvm-unit-tests PULL 00/17] New s390x kvm-unit-tests and some fixes Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:36 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 01/17] s390x: Support PSW restart boot Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:36 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 02/17] s390x: Diag288 test Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 03/17] s390x: Move stsi to library Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 04/17] s390x: STSI tests Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 05/17] s390x: Add diag308 subcode 0 testing Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 06/17] s390x: Move pfmf to lib and make address void Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 08/17] s390x: Bump march to zEC12 Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 09/17] s390x: Add storage key removal facility Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 10/17] s390x: Fix stsi unaligned test and add selector tests Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 11/17] s390x: Use interrupts in SCLP and add locking Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 12/17] s390x: Add linemode console Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 13/17] s390x: Add linemode buffer to fix newline on every print Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 14/17] s390x: Add initial smp code Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 15/17] s390x: Prepare for external calls Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 16/17] s390x: SMP test Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 17/17] s390x: Free allocated page in iep test Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:39 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 00/17] New s390x kvm-unit-tests and some fixes Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190925163714.27519-8-thuth@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox