From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9658EFA3728 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:30:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765D021928 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:30:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2393985AbfJPOav (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 10:30:51 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:50298 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728190AbfJPOav (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 10:30:51 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x9GEPE88103432 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 10:30:50 -0400 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2vp396w1m5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 10:30:46 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 15:30:37 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 16 Oct 2019 15:30:35 +0100 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x9GEUXAY50200810 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:30:33 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37547AE045; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:30:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA9ACAE055; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:30:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc2783563651 (unknown [9.152.224.193]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:30:32 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 16:30:21 +0200 From: Halil Pasic To: Eric Farman Cc: Cornelia Huck , Steffen Maier , Jason Herne , Jared Rossi , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] vfio-ccw: A couple trace changes In-Reply-To: <20191016142040.14132-1-farman@linux.ibm.com> References: <20191016142040.14132-1-farman@linux.ibm.com> Organization: IBM X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19101614-0020-0000-0000-000003799C97 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19101614-0021-0000-0000-000021CFC133 Message-Id: <20191016163021.1beb591c.pasic@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-10-16_06:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=726 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910160125 Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 16:20:36 +0200 Eric Farman wrote: > Here a couple updates to the vfio-ccw traces in the kernel, > based on things I've been using locally. Perhaps they'll > be useful for future debugging. > Hi! I had a brief look, no full blown review though. You can add an ack by me for all the patches in this series. Regards, Halil