From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Jinpu Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
Cc: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Broadwell server reboot with vmx: unexpected exit reason 0x3
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 11:52:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191017185236.GH20903@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMGffE=NFdkg3Qh9pwvWcS2QhqmPJ4Lb4UMSB_Aomsx8H8_PDw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 10:53:40AM +0200, Jinpu Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 7:29 PM Sean Christopherson
> <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 01:48:15PM +0300, Liran Alon wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 30 Sep 2019, at 11:43, Jinpu Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear KVM experts,
> > > >
> > > > We have a Broadwell server reboot itself recently, before the reboot,
> > > > there were error messages from KVM in netconsole:
> > > > [5599380.317055] kvm [9046]: vcpu1, guest rIP: 0xffffffff816ad716 vmx:
> > > > unexpected exit reason 0x3
> > > > [5599380.317060] kvm [49626]: vcpu0, guest rIP: 0xffffffff81060fe6
> > > > vmx: unexpected exit reason 0x3
> > > > [5599380.317062] kvm [36632]: vcpu0, guest rIP: 0xffffffff8103970d
> > > > vmx: unexpected exit reason 0x3
> > > > [5599380.317064] kvm [9620]: vcpu1, guest rIP: 0xffffffffb6c1b08e vmx:
> > > > unexpected exit reason 0x3
> > > > [5599380.317067] kvm [49925]: vcpu5, guest rIP: 0xffffffff9b406ea2
> > > > vmx: unexpected exit reason 0x3
> > > > [5599380.317068] kvm [49925]: vcpu3, guest rIP: 0xffffffff9b406ea2
> > > > vmx: unexpected exit reason 0x3
> > > > [5599380.317070] kvm [33871]: vcpu2, guest rIP: 0xffffffff81060fe6
> > > > vmx: unexpected exit reason 0x3
> > > > [5599380.317072] kvm [49925]: vcpu4, guest rIP: 0xffffffff9b406ea2
> > > > vmx: unexpected exit reason 0x3
> > > > [5599380.317074] kvm [48505]: vcpu1, guest rIP: 0xffffffffaf36bf9b
> > > > vmx: unexpected exit reason 0x3
> > > > [5599380.317076] kvm [21880]: vcpu1, guest rIP: 0xffffffff8103970d
> > > > vmx: unexpected exit reason 0x3
> > >
> > > The only way a CPU will raise this exit-reason (3 == EXIT_REASON_INIT_SIGNAL)
> > > is if CPU is in VMX non-root mode while it has a pending INIT signal in LAPIC.
> > >
> > > In simple terms, it means that one CPU was running inside guest while
> > > another CPU have sent it a signal to reset itself.
> > >
> > > I see in code that kvm_init() does register_reboot_notifier(&kvm_reboot_notifier).
> > > kvm_reboot() runs hardware_disable_nolock() on each CPU before reboot.
> > > Which should result on every CPU running VMX’s hardware_disable() which should
> > > exit VMX operation (VMXOFF) and disable VMX (Clear CR4.VMXE).
> > >
> > > Therefore, I’m quite puzzled on how a server reboot triggers the scenario you
> > > present here. Can you send your full kernel log?
> >
> > My guess is that the system triggered an emergency reboot and was either
> > unable to force CPUs out of VMX non-root with NMIs, hit a triple fault
> > shutdown and auto-generated INITs before it could shootdown the other
> > CPUs, or didn't even attempt the NMI because VMX wasn't enabled on the
> > CPU that triggered reboot.
> >
> > In arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c:
> >
> > /* Use NMIs as IPIs to tell all CPUs to disable virtualization */
> > static void emergency_vmx_disable_all(void)
> > {
> > /* Just make sure we won't change CPUs while doing this */
> > local_irq_disable();
> >
> > /*
> > * We need to disable VMX on all CPUs before rebooting, otherwise
> > * we risk hanging up the machine, because the CPU ignore INIT
> > * signals when VMX is enabled.
> > *
> > * We can't take any locks and we may be on an inconsistent
> > * state, so we use NMIs as IPIs to tell the other CPUs to disable
> > * VMX and halt.
> > *
> > * For safety, we will avoid running the nmi_shootdown_cpus()
> > * stuff unnecessarily, but we don't have a way to check
> > * if other CPUs have VMX enabled. So we will call it only if the
> > * CPU we are running on has VMX enabled.
> > *
> > * We will miss cases where VMX is not enabled on all CPUs. This
> > * shouldn't do much harm because KVM always enable VMX on all
> > * CPUs anyway. But we can miss it on the small window where KVM
> > * is still enabling VMX.
> > */
> > if (cpu_has_vmx() && cpu_vmx_enabled()) {
> > /* Disable VMX on this CPU. */
> > cpu_vmxoff();
> >
> > /* Halt and disable VMX on the other CPUs */
> > nmi_shootdown_cpus(vmxoff_nmi);
> >
> > }
> > }
> >
> > static void native_machine_emergency_restart(void)
> > {
> > ...
> >
> > if (reboot_emergency)
> > emergency_vmx_disable_all();
> > }
> >
> Thanks for the information, Sean, I checked the call path for
> emergency_restart, I would expect there should be a kernel message
> to indicate the reason why it has to do the emergency_restart, but
> there is nothing logged in netconsole or kernel log. I don't
> understand.
>
> Do you have a guess what could cause the system to trigger an emergency reboot?
Not really. The emergency reboot thing itself is a guess. Sorry :-(
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-17 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-30 8:43 Broadwell server reboot with vmx: unexpected exit reason 0x3 Jinpu Wang
2019-09-30 10:48 ` Liran Alon
2019-10-02 17:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-10-04 8:53 ` Jinpu Wang
2019-10-17 18:52 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191017185236.GH20903@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox