From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall.oss@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH kvmtool 09/16] arm: Allow the user to specify RAM base address
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 13:54:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191107135452.09c2ff38@donnerap.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1569245722-23375-10-git-send-email-alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:35:15 +0100
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> wrote:
Hi,
> At the moment, the user can specify the amount of RAM a virtual machine
> has, which starts at the fixed address ARM_MEMORY_AREA. The memory below
> this address is used by MMIO and PCI devices.
>
> However, it might be interesting to specify a different starting address
> for the guest RAM. With this patch, the user can specify the address and
> the amount of RAM a virtual machine has from the command line by using the
> syntax -m/--mem size[@addr]. The address is optional, and must be higher or
> equal to ARM_MEMORY_AREA. If it's not specified, the old behavior is
> preserved.
>
> This option is guarded by the define ARCH_SUPPORT_CFG_RAM_BASE, and at
> the moment only the arm architecture has support for it. If an
> architecture doesn't implement this feature, then the old behavior is
> preserved and specifying the RAM base address is considered an user
> error.
>
> This patch is based upon previous work by Julien Grall.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Same thing here with "S-o-b: Julien" vs. authorship.
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
> ---
> arm/aarch32/include/kvm/kvm-arch.h | 2 +-
> arm/aarch64/include/kvm/kvm-arch.h | 6 ++---
> arm/include/arm-common/kvm-arch.h | 6 +++--
> arm/kvm.c | 17 ++++++++++----
> builtin-run.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> include/kvm/kvm-config.h | 3 +++
> kvm.c | 6 +++++
> 7 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arm/aarch32/include/kvm/kvm-arch.h b/arm/aarch32/include/kvm/kvm-arch.h
> index cd31e72971bd..0aa5db40502d 100644
> --- a/arm/aarch32/include/kvm/kvm-arch.h
> +++ b/arm/aarch32/include/kvm/kvm-arch.h
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>
> #define ARM_KERN_OFFSET(...) 0x8000
>
> -#define ARM_MAX_MEMORY(...) ARM_LOMAP_MAX_MEMORY
> +#define ARM_MAX_ADDR(...) ARM_LOMAP_MAX_ADDR
>
> #include "arm-common/kvm-arch.h"
>
> diff --git a/arm/aarch64/include/kvm/kvm-arch.h b/arm/aarch64/include/kvm/kvm-arch.h
> index 1b3d0a5fb1b4..0c58675654c5 100644
> --- a/arm/aarch64/include/kvm/kvm-arch.h
> +++ b/arm/aarch64/include/kvm/kvm-arch.h
> @@ -5,9 +5,9 @@
> 0x8000 : \
> 0x80000)
>
> -#define ARM_MAX_MEMORY(cfg) ((cfg)->arch.aarch32_guest ? \
> - ARM_LOMAP_MAX_MEMORY : \
> - ARM_HIMAP_MAX_MEMORY)
> +#define ARM_MAX_ADDR(cfg) ((cfg)->arch.aarch32_guest ? \
> + ARM_LOMAP_MAX_ADDR : \
> + ARM_HIMAP_MAX_ADDR)
>
> #include "arm-common/kvm-arch.h"
>
> diff --git a/arm/include/arm-common/kvm-arch.h b/arm/include/arm-common/kvm-arch.h
> index f8f6b8f98c96..ad1a0e6872dc 100644
> --- a/arm/include/arm-common/kvm-arch.h
> +++ b/arm/include/arm-common/kvm-arch.h
> @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@
> #define ARM_AXI_AREA _AC(0x0000000040000000, UL)
> #define ARM_MEMORY_AREA _AC(0x0000000080000000, UL)
>
> -#define ARM_LOMAP_MAX_MEMORY ((1ULL << 32) - ARM_MEMORY_AREA)
> -#define ARM_HIMAP_MAX_MEMORY ((1ULL << 40) - ARM_MEMORY_AREA)
> +#define ARM_LOMAP_MAX_ADDR (1ULL << 32)
> +#define ARM_HIMAP_MAX_ADDR (1ULL << 40)
>
> #define ARM_GIC_DIST_BASE (ARM_AXI_AREA - ARM_GIC_DIST_SIZE)
> #define ARM_GIC_CPUI_BASE (ARM_GIC_DIST_BASE - ARM_GIC_CPUI_SIZE)
> @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@
>
> #define KVM_IOEVENTFD_HAS_PIO 0
>
> +#define ARCH_SUPPORT_CFG_RAM_BASE 1
> +
> /*
> * On a GICv3 there must be one redistributor per vCPU.
> * The value here is the size for one, we multiply this at runtime with
> diff --git a/arm/kvm.c b/arm/kvm.c
> index 3e49db7704aa..355c118b098a 100644
> --- a/arm/kvm.c
> +++ b/arm/kvm.c
> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ void kvm__init_ram(struct kvm *kvm)
> madvise(kvm->arch.ram_alloc_start, kvm->arch.ram_alloc_size,
> MADV_HUGEPAGE);
>
> - phys_start = ARM_MEMORY_AREA;
> + phys_start = kvm->cfg.ram_base;
> phys_size = kvm->ram_size;
> host_mem = kvm->ram_start;
>
> @@ -106,8 +106,17 @@ void kvm__arch_set_cmdline(char *cmdline, bool video)
>
> void kvm__arch_sanitize_cfg(struct kvm_config *cfg)
> {
> - if (cfg->ram_size > ARM_MAX_MEMORY(cfg)) {
> - cfg->ram_size = ARM_MAX_MEMORY(cfg);
> + if (cfg->ram_base == INVALID_MEM_ADDR)
> + cfg->ram_base = ARM_MEMORY_AREA;
> +
> + if (cfg->ram_base < ARM_MEMORY_AREA ||
> + cfg->ram_base >= ARM_MAX_ADDR(cfg)) {
> + cfg->ram_base = ARM_MEMORY_AREA;
> + pr_warning("Changing RAM base to 0x%llx", cfg->ram_base);
> + }
> +
> + if (cfg->ram_base + cfg->ram_size > ARM_MAX_ADDR(cfg)) {
> + cfg->ram_size = ARM_MAX_ADDR(cfg) - cfg->ram_base;
> pr_warning("Capping memory to %lluMB", cfg->ram_size >> 20);
> }
Should we check for alignment of the base address here as well? It definitely needs to be at least page aligned.
But even then: -m 512@0x87654000 doesn't really go anywhere, I needed 1MB alignment for Linux to boot.
But that's probably a Linux restriction. Maybe a warning if the lower 20 bits are not zero?
> }
> @@ -229,7 +238,7 @@ bool kvm__load_firmware(struct kvm *kvm, const char *firmware_filename)
>
> /* For default firmware address, lets load it at the begining of RAM */
> if (fw_addr == 0)
> - fw_addr = ARM_MEMORY_AREA;
> + fw_addr = kvm->cfg.ram_base;
>
> if (!validate_fw_addr(kvm, fw_addr))
> die("Bad firmware destination: 0x%016llx", fw_addr);
> diff --git a/builtin-run.c b/builtin-run.c
> index 4e0c52b3e027..df255cc44078 100644
> --- a/builtin-run.c
> +++ b/builtin-run.c
> @@ -87,6 +87,44 @@ void kvm_run_set_wrapper_sandbox(void)
> kvm_run_wrapper = KVM_RUN_SANDBOX;
> }
>
> +static int mem_parser(const struct option *opt, const char *arg, int unset)
> +{
> + struct kvm_config *cfg = opt->value;
> + const char *p = arg;
> + char *next;
> + u64 size, addr = INVALID_MEM_ADDR;
> +
> + /* Parse memory size. */
> + size = strtoll(p, &next, 0);
> + if (next == p)
> + die("Invalid memory size");
> +
> + /* The user specifies the memory in MB, we use bytes. */
> + size <<= MB_SHIFT;
> +
> + if (*next == '\0')
> + goto out;
> + else if (*next == '@')
I think coding style dictates no "else" if the "if" statement always terminates (return or goto).
> + p = next + 1;
> + else
> + die("Unexpected character after memory size: %c", *next);
And you could move this up, so that you check for bail outs first:
if (*next == '\0')
goto out;
if (*next != '@')
die();
p = next + 1;
...
> +
> + addr = strtoll(p, &next, 0);
> + if (next == p)
> + die("Invalid memory address");
> +
> +#ifndef ARCH_SUPPORT_CFG_RAM_BASE
> + if (addr != INVALID_MEM_ADDR)
Should this #ifndef cover more of the parsing routine? It looks a bit weird to first do all the work and then throw it away.
And can we somehow avoid the #ifdef at all? Maybe replacing it with a proper "if" statement? To integrate into the conditions above:
if (!IS_ENABLED(ARCH_SUPPORT_CFG_RAM_BASE) || *next != '@')
die();
Cheers,
Andre.
> + die("Specifying the memory address not supported by the architecture");
> +#endif
> +
> +out:
> + cfg->ram_base = addr;
> + cfg->ram_size = size;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> #ifndef OPT_ARCH_RUN
> #define OPT_ARCH_RUN(...)
> #endif
> @@ -97,8 +135,11 @@ void kvm_run_set_wrapper_sandbox(void)
> OPT_STRING('\0', "name", &(cfg)->guest_name, "guest name", \
> "A name for the guest"), \
> OPT_INTEGER('c', "cpus", &(cfg)->nrcpus, "Number of CPUs"), \
> - OPT_U64('m', "mem", &(cfg)->ram_size, "Virtual machine memory" \
> - " size in MB."), \
> + OPT_CALLBACK('m', "mem", cfg, \
> + "size[@addr]", \
> + "Virtual machine memory size in MB," \
> + " optionally starting at <addr>.", \
> + mem_parser, NULL), \
> OPT_CALLBACK('\0', "shmem", NULL, \
> "[pci:]<addr>:<size>[:handle=<handle>][:create]", \
> "Share host shmem with guest via pci device", \
> @@ -531,9 +572,6 @@ static struct kvm *kvm_cmd_run_init(int argc, const char **argv)
>
> if (!kvm->cfg.ram_size)
> kvm->cfg.ram_size = get_ram_size(kvm->cfg.nrcpus);
> - else
> - /* The user specifies the memory in MB. */
> - kvm->cfg.ram_size <<= MB_SHIFT;
>
> if (kvm->cfg.ram_size > host_ram_size())
> pr_warning("Guest memory size %lluMB exceeds host physical RAM size %lluMB",
> diff --git a/include/kvm/kvm-config.h b/include/kvm/kvm-config.h
> index e0c9ee14e103..76edb54e8bae 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/kvm-config.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/kvm-config.h
> @@ -18,10 +18,13 @@
> #define MIN_RAM_SIZE_MB (64ULL)
> #define MIN_RAM_SIZE_BYTE (MIN_RAM_SIZE_MB << MB_SHIFT)
>
> +#define INVALID_MEM_ADDR (~0ULL)
> +
> struct kvm_config {
> struct kvm_config_arch arch;
> struct disk_image_params disk_image[MAX_DISK_IMAGES];
> struct vfio_device_params *vfio_devices;
> + u64 ram_base;
> u64 ram_size; /* Guest memory size, in bytes */
> u8 image_count;
> u8 num_net_devices;
> diff --git a/kvm.c b/kvm.c
> index 36b238791fc1..55a7465960b0 100644
> --- a/kvm.c
> +++ b/kvm.c
> @@ -160,6 +160,12 @@ struct kvm *kvm__new(void)
> kvm->sys_fd = -1;
> kvm->vm_fd = -1;
>
> + /*
> + * Make sure we don't mistake the initialization value 0 for ram_base
> + * with an user specifying address 0.
> + */
> + kvm->cfg.ram_base = INVALID_MEM_ADDR;
> +
> #ifdef KVM_BRLOCK_DEBUG
> kvm->brlock_sem = (pthread_rwlock_t) PTHREAD_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER;
> #endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-07 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-23 13:35 [PATCH kvmtool 00/16] arm: Allow the user to define the memory layout Alexandru Elisei
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 01/16] arm: Allow use of hugepage with 16K pagesize host Alexandru Elisei
2019-11-06 16:47 ` Andre Przywara
2019-11-06 17:29 ` Alexandru Elisei
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 02/16] kvm__arch_init: Don't pass hugetlbfs_path and ram_size in parameter Alexandru Elisei
2019-11-06 16:47 ` Andre Przywara
2019-11-07 10:03 ` Alexandru Elisei
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 03/16] virtio/scsi: Allow the use of multiple banks Alexandru Elisei
2019-11-06 16:48 ` Andre Przywara
2020-02-05 18:07 ` Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 04/16] kvmtool: Add helper to sanitize arch specific KVM configuration Alexandru Elisei
2019-11-06 16:48 ` Andre Przywara
2019-11-07 10:05 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-02-05 18:16 ` Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 05/16] kvmtool: Use MB consistently Alexandru Elisei
2019-11-06 16:49 ` Andre Przywara
2020-02-05 18:17 ` Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 06/16] builtin-run.c: Always use ram_size in bytes Alexandru Elisei
2019-11-06 16:49 ` Andre Przywara
2019-11-07 10:08 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-02-05 19:03 ` Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 07/16] arm: Remove redundant define ARM_PCI_CFG_SIZE Alexandru Elisei
2019-11-06 16:49 ` Andre Przywara
2020-02-06 11:49 ` Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 08/16] arm: Move anything related to RAM initialization in kvm__init_ram Alexandru Elisei
2019-11-07 13:46 ` Andre Przywara
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 09/16] arm: Allow the user to specify RAM base address Alexandru Elisei
2019-11-07 13:54 ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2020-02-06 12:20 ` Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 10/16] kvmtool: Allow standard size specifiers for memory Alexandru Elisei
2019-11-07 13:55 ` Andre Przywara
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 11/16] arm/pci: Remove unused ioports Alexandru Elisei
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 12/16] Fold kvm__init_ram call in kvm__arch_init and rename it Alexandru Elisei
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 13/16] arm: Allow any base address for RAM Alexandru Elisei
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 14/16] arm: Move memory related code to memory.c Alexandru Elisei
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 15/16] kvmtool: Make the size@addr option parser globally visible Alexandru Elisei
2019-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH kvmtool 16/16] arm: Allow the user to define the MMIO regions Alexandru Elisei
2020-02-05 17:16 ` [PATCH kvmtool 00/16] arm: Allow the user to define the memory layout Will Deacon
2020-02-05 17:18 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-02-06 9:20 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191107135452.09c2ff38@donnerap.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=julien.grall.oss@gmail.com \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox