From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Jason Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
Jared Rossi <jrossi@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 06/10] vfio-ccw: Introduce a new CRW region
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 18:17:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191119181726.440dd30d.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191115025620.19593-7-farman@linux.ibm.com>
On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 03:56:16 +0100
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> From: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
>
> This region can be used by userspace to get channel report
> words from vfio-ccw driver.
I think this needs a bit more explanation; this is for channel report
words concerning vfio-ccw devices that are supposed to be relayed to
the guest, IIUC?
>
> We provide space for two CRWs, per the limit in the
> base driver (see crw_collect_info()).
That rationale seems a bit sketchy.
As far as I know, current systems provide at most two crws chained
together for an event (one for the ssid + one for the subchannel id in
case of a subchannel event, one crw for other events); and that's the
reason why we provide space for two crws (unless there's something
upcoming which would need three crws chained together?)
>
> Signed-off-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v0->v1: [EF]
> - Clean up checkpatch (whitespace) errors
> - Add ret=-ENOMEM in error path for new region
> - Add io_mutex for region read (originally in last patch)
> - Change crw1/crw2 to crw0/crw1
> - Reorder cleanup of regions
>
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_chp.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c | 20 +++++++++++
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c | 4 +++
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h | 3 ++
> include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 1 +
> include/uapi/linux/vfio_ccw.h | 5 +++
> 6 files changed, 86 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_chp.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_chp.c
> index 826d08379fe3..d1e8bfef06be 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_chp.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_chp.c
> @@ -73,3 +73,56 @@ int vfio_ccw_register_schib_dev_regions(struct vfio_ccw_private *private)
> VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_READ,
> private->schib_region);
> }
> +
> +static ssize_t vfio_ccw_crw_region_read(struct vfio_ccw_private *private,
> + char __user *buf, size_t count,
> + loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> + unsigned int i = VFIO_CCW_OFFSET_TO_INDEX(*ppos) - VFIO_CCW_NUM_REGIONS;
> + loff_t pos = *ppos & VFIO_CCW_OFFSET_MASK;
> + struct ccw_crw_region *region;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (pos + count > sizeof(*region))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&private->io_mutex);
> + region = private->region[i].data;
> +
> + if (copy_to_user(buf, (void *)region + pos, count))
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + else
> + ret = count;
> +
Can userspace read the same crw(s) multiple times? How can it find out
if there's something new in there?
> + mutex_unlock(&private->io_mutex);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
(...)
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio_ccw.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio_ccw.h
> index 7c0a834e5d7a..88b125aad279 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio_ccw.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio_ccw.h
> @@ -39,4 +39,9 @@ struct ccw_schib_region {
> __u8 schib_area[SCHIB_AREA_SIZE];
> } __packed;
>
I think this one wants an explaining comment as well.
> +struct ccw_crw_region {
> + __u32 crw0;
> + __u32 crw1;
> +} __packed;
> +
> #endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-19 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-15 2:56 [RFC PATCH v1 00/10] s390/vfio-ccw: Channel Path Handling Eric Farman
2019-11-15 2:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/10] vfio-ccw: Introduce new helper functions to free/destroy regions Eric Farman
2019-11-19 12:33 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-15 2:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/10] vfio-ccw: Register a chp_event callback for vfio-ccw Eric Farman
2019-11-19 12:48 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-19 15:45 ` Eric Farman
2019-11-15 2:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/10] vfio-ccw: Use subchannel lpm in the orb Eric Farman
2019-11-19 13:00 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-19 15:16 ` Eric Farman
2019-11-19 15:38 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-19 18:58 ` Eric Farman
2019-11-15 2:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/10] vfio-ccw: Refactor the unregister of the async regions Eric Farman
2019-11-19 16:21 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-15 2:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/10] vfio-ccw: Introduce a new schib region Eric Farman
2019-11-19 16:52 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-20 16:49 ` Eric Farman
2019-11-15 2:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/10] vfio-ccw: Introduce a new CRW region Eric Farman
2019-11-19 17:17 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2019-11-15 2:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/10] vfio-ccw: Refactor IRQ handlers Eric Farman
2019-11-19 17:18 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-15 2:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/10] vfio-ccw: Wire up the CRW irq and CRW region Eric Farman
2019-11-19 18:52 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-05 20:43 ` Eric Farman
2019-12-06 10:21 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-06 21:24 ` Eric Farman
2019-12-09 12:38 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-15 2:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/10] vfio-ccw: Add trace for CRW event Eric Farman
2019-11-15 2:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/10] vfio-ccw: Remove inline get_schid() routine Eric Farman
2019-11-15 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v1 00/10] s390/vfio-ccw: Channel Path Handling Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191119181726.440dd30d.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jrossi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).