Re: [PATCH RFC 04/15] KVM: Implement ring-based dirty memory tracking

Paolo Bonzini
2019-12-17T16:31:59Z

On 17/12/19 16:38, Peter Xu wrote:
> There's still time to persuade me to going back to it. :)
>
> (Though, yes I still like current solution... if we can get rid of the
> only kvmgt ugliness, we can even throw away the per-vm ring with its
> "extra" 4k page. Then I suppose it'll be even harder to persuade me :)

Actually that's what convinced me in the first place, so let's
absolutely get rid of both the per-VM ring and the union. Kevin and
Alex have answered and everybody seems to agree.

Paolo