public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
	imbrenda@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 5/6] s390x: css: testing ssch error response
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:18:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201e476c-a014-55f6-b4d0-ff2c1d429c42@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1616073988-10381-6-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>

On 3/18/21 2:26 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
> Checking error response on various eroneous SSCH instructions:
> - ORB alignment
> - ORB above 2G
> - CCW above 2G
> - bad ORB flags
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  s390x/css.c | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 102 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/s390x/css.c b/s390x/css.c
> index a6a9773..1c891f8 100644
> --- a/s390x/css.c
> +++ b/s390x/css.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,107 @@ static void test_enable(void)
>  	report(cc == 0, "Enable subchannel %08x", test_device_sid);
>  }
>  
> +static void test_ssch(void)
> +{
> +	struct orb orb = {
> +		.intparm = test_device_sid,
> +		.ctrl = ORB_CTRL_ISIC | ORB_CTRL_FMT | ORB_LPM_DFLT,
> +	};
> +	int i;
> +	phys_addr_t base, top;
> +
> +	assert(css_enable(test_device_sid, IO_SCH_ISC) == 0);
> +	assert(register_io_int_func(css_irq_io) == 0);
> +
> +	/* ORB address should be aligned on 32 bits */
> +	report_prefix_push("ORB alignment");
> +	expect_pgm_int();
> +	ssch(test_device_sid, (void *)0x110002);
> +	check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_SPECIFICATION);
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	/* ORB address should be lower than 2G */
> +	report_prefix_push("ORB Address above 2G");
> +	expect_pgm_int();
> +	ssch(test_device_sid, (void *)0x80000000);
> +	check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_ADDRESSING);
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	phys_alloc_get_unused(&base, &top);
> +	report_info("base %08lx, top %08lx", base, top);

Please use this function from lib/s390x/sclp.c

uint64_t get_ram_size(void)
{
        return ram_size;
}

> +
> +	/* ORB address should be available we check 1G*/
> +	report_prefix_push("ORB Address must be available");
> +	if (top < 0x40000000) {
> +		expect_pgm_int();
> +		ssch(test_device_sid, (void *)0x40000000);
> +		check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_ADDRESSING);
> +	} else {
> +		report_skip("guest started with more than 1G memory");
> +	}
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("CCW address above 2G");
> +	orb.cpa = 0x80000000;
> +	expect_pgm_int();
> +	ssch(test_device_sid, &orb);
> +	check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_OPERAND);
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	senseid = alloc_io_mem(sizeof(*senseid), 0);
> +	assert(senseid);
> +	orb.cpa = (uint64_t)ccw_alloc(CCW_CMD_SENSE_ID, senseid,
> +				      sizeof(*senseid), CCW_F_SLI);
> +	assert(orb.cpa);
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("Disabled subchannel");
> +	assert(css_disable(test_device_sid) == 0);
> +	report(ssch(test_device_sid, &orb) == 3, "CC = 3");
> +	assert(css_enable(test_device_sid, IO_SCH_ISC) == 0);
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Check sending a second SSCH before clearing the status with TSCH
> +	 * the subchannel is left disabled.

If a second SSCH is sent before clearing via TSCH the subchannel is
disabled by firmware? Did I get that right?

> +	 */
> +	report_prefix_push("SSCH on channel with status pending");
> +	assert(css_enable(test_device_sid, IO_SCH_ISC) == 0);
> +	assert(ssch(test_device_sid, &orb) == 0);
> +	report(ssch(test_device_sid, &orb) == 1, "CC = 1");
> +	/* now we clear the status */
> +	assert(wait_and_check_io_completion(test_device_sid, SCSW_FC_START) == 0);
> +	assert(css_disable(test_device_sid) == 0);
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("ORB MIDAW unsupported");
> +	assert(css_enable(test_device_sid, IO_SCH_ISC) == 0);
> +	orb.ctrl |= ORB_CTRL_MIDAW;
> +	expect_pgm_int();
> +	ssch(test_device_sid, &orb);
> +	check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_OPERAND);
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +	orb.ctrl = 0;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
> +		char buffer[30];
> +
> +		orb.ctrl = (0x02 << i);
> +		snprintf(buffer, 30, "ORB reserved ctrl flags %02x", orb.ctrl);
> +		report_prefix_push(buffer);
> +		expect_pgm_int();
> +		ssch(test_device_sid, &orb);
> +		check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_OPERAND);
> +		report_prefix_pop();
> +	}
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("ORB wrong ctrl flags");
> +	orb.ctrl |= 0x040000;
> +	expect_pgm_int();
> +	ssch(test_device_sid, &orb);
> +	check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_OPERAND);
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * test_sense
>   * Pre-requisites:
> @@ -339,6 +440,7 @@ static struct {
>  	{ "initialize CSS (chsc)", css_init },
>  	{ "enumerate (stsch)", test_enumerate },
>  	{ "enable (msch)", test_enable },
> +	{ "start subchannel", test_ssch },
>  	{ "sense (ssch/tsch)", test_sense },
>  	{ "measurement block (schm)", test_schm },
>  	{ "measurement block format0", test_schm_fmt0 },
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-19  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-18 13:26 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 0/6] Testing SSCH, CSCH and HSCH for errors Pierre Morel
2021-03-18 13:26 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 1/6] s390x: lib: css: disabling a subchannel Pierre Morel
2021-03-19  9:02   ` Janosch Frank
2021-03-19  9:11     ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-19 10:03   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-03-19 10:11     ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-19 15:29     ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-18 13:26 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 2/6] s390x: lib: css: SCSW bit definitions Pierre Morel
2021-03-19 10:16   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-03-19 15:30     ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-18 13:26 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 3/6] s390x: lib: css: upgrading IRQ handling Pierre Morel
2021-03-18 14:22   ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-19 11:01   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-03-19 15:55     ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-19 16:09       ` Cornelia Huck
2021-03-19 16:34         ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-18 13:26 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 4/6] s390x: lib: css: add expectations to wait for interrupt Pierre Morel
2021-03-19  9:09   ` Janosch Frank
2021-03-19  9:50     ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-19 11:23       ` Cornelia Huck
2021-03-19 16:18         ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-18 13:26 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 5/6] s390x: css: testing ssch error response Pierre Morel
2021-03-19  9:18   ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2021-03-19 10:02     ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-18 13:26 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 6/6] s390x: css: testing clear and halt subchannel Pierre Morel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201e476c-a014-55f6-b4d0-ff2c1d429c42@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox