From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/7] s390x: smp: Rework cpu start and active tracking
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 07:05:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200116120513.2244-5-frankja@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200116120513.2244-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
sigp is not synchronous on all hypervisors, so we need to wait until
the cpu runs until we return from the setup/start function.
As there was a lot of duplicate code a common function for cpu
restarts has been intropduced.
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
lib/s390x/smp.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/s390x/smp.c b/lib/s390x/smp.c
index f57f420..f984a34 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/smp.c
+++ b/lib/s390x/smp.c
@@ -104,35 +104,41 @@ int smp_cpu_stop_store_status(uint16_t addr)
return rc;
}
+static int smp_cpu_restart_nolock(uint16_t addr, struct psw *psw)
+{
+ int rc;
+ struct cpu *cpu = smp_cpu_from_addr(addr);
+
+ if (!cpu)
+ return -1;
+ if (psw) {
+ cpu->lowcore->restart_new_psw.mask = psw->mask;
+ cpu->lowcore->restart_new_psw.addr = psw->addr;
+ }
+ rc = sigp(addr, SIGP_RESTART, 0, NULL);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+ while (!smp_cpu_running(addr)) { mb(); }
+ cpu->active = true;
+ return 0;
+}
+
int smp_cpu_restart(uint16_t addr)
{
- int rc = -1;
- struct cpu *cpu;
+ int rc;
spin_lock(&lock);
- cpu = smp_cpu_from_addr(addr);
- if (cpu) {
- rc = sigp(addr, SIGP_RESTART, 0, NULL);
- cpu->active = true;
- }
+ rc = smp_cpu_restart_nolock(addr, NULL);
spin_unlock(&lock);
return rc;
}
int smp_cpu_start(uint16_t addr, struct psw psw)
{
- int rc = -1;
- struct cpu *cpu;
- struct lowcore *lc;
+ int rc;
spin_lock(&lock);
- cpu = smp_cpu_from_addr(addr);
- if (cpu) {
- lc = cpu->lowcore;
- lc->restart_new_psw.mask = psw.mask;
- lc->restart_new_psw.addr = psw.addr;
- rc = sigp(addr, SIGP_RESTART, 0, NULL);
- }
+ rc = smp_cpu_restart_nolock(addr, &psw);
spin_unlock(&lock);
return rc;
}
@@ -192,10 +198,7 @@ int smp_cpu_setup(uint16_t addr, struct psw psw)
lc->sw_int_crs[0] = 0x0000000000040000UL;
/* Start processing */
- rc = sigp_retry(cpu->addr, SIGP_RESTART, 0, NULL);
- if (!rc)
- cpu->active = true;
-
+ smp_cpu_restart_nolock(addr, NULL);
out:
spin_unlock(&lock);
return rc;
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-16 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-16 12:05 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/7] s390x: smp: Improve smp code and reset checks Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/7] s390x: smp: Cleanup smp.c Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 13:01 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/7] s390x: smp: Only use smp_cpu_setup once Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 13:01 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/7] s390x: Add cpu id to interrupt error prints Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 13:04 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 13:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 13:59 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-16 14:11 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:05 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2020-01-16 14:14 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/7] s390x: smp: Rework cpu start and active tracking Cornelia Huck
2020-01-16 14:44 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 15:05 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 5/7] s390x: smp: Wait for cpu setup to finish Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 6/7] s390x: smp: Test all CRs on initial reset Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 13:07 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 13:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 7/7] s390x: smp: Dirty fpc before initial reset test Janosch Frank
2020-01-17 10:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-17 10:29 ` Thomas Huth
2020-01-17 10:41 ` Janosch Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200116120513.2244-5-frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox