From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 2/9] s390x: smp: Only use smp_cpu_setup once
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 05:46:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200117104640.1983-3-frankja@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200117104640.1983-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Let's stop and start instead of using setup to run a function on a
cpu.
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
s390x/smp.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/s390x/smp.c b/s390x/smp.c
index 8d8e3a5..555ed72 100644
--- a/s390x/smp.c
+++ b/s390x/smp.c
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static void test_start(void)
psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
- smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
+ smp_cpu_start(1, psw);
wait_for_flag();
report(1, "start");
}
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ static void test_store_status(void)
report(1, "status written");
free_pages(status, PAGE_SIZE * 2);
report_prefix_pop();
+ smp_cpu_stop(1);
report_prefix_pop();
}
@@ -130,9 +131,8 @@ static void test_ecall(void)
report_prefix_push("ecall");
testflag = 0;
- smp_cpu_destroy(1);
- smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
+ smp_cpu_start(1, psw);
wait_for_flag();
testflag = 0;
sigp(1, SIGP_EXTERNAL_CALL, 0, NULL);
@@ -165,9 +165,8 @@ static void test_emcall(void)
report_prefix_push("emcall");
testflag = 0;
- smp_cpu_destroy(1);
- smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
+ smp_cpu_start(1, psw);
wait_for_flag();
testflag = 0;
sigp(1, SIGP_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL, 0, NULL);
@@ -185,7 +184,7 @@ static void test_reset_initial(void)
psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
report_prefix_push("reset initial");
- smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
+ smp_cpu_start(1, psw);
sigp_retry(1, SIGP_INITIAL_CPU_RESET, 0, NULL);
sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_STATUS_AT_ADDRESS, (uintptr_t)status, NULL);
@@ -216,7 +215,7 @@ static void test_reset(void)
psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
report_prefix_push("cpu reset");
- smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
+ smp_cpu_start(1, psw);
sigp_retry(1, SIGP_CPU_RESET, 0, NULL);
report(smp_cpu_stopped(1), "cpu stopped");
@@ -225,6 +224,7 @@ static void test_reset(void)
int main(void)
{
+ struct psw psw;
report_prefix_push("smp");
if (smp_query_num_cpus() == 1) {
@@ -232,6 +232,12 @@ int main(void)
goto done;
}
+ /* Setting up the cpu to give it a stack and lowcore */
+ psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
+ psw.addr = (unsigned long)cpu_loop;
+ smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
+ smp_cpu_stop(1);
+
test_start();
test_stop();
test_stop_store_status();
@@ -240,6 +246,7 @@ int main(void)
test_emcall();
test_reset();
test_reset_initial();
+ smp_cpu_destroy(1);
done:
report_prefix_pop();
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-17 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-17 10:46 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/9] s390x: smp: Improve smp code and reset checks Janosch Frank
2020-01-17 10:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/9] s390x: smp: Cleanup smp.c Janosch Frank
2020-01-20 12:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-17 10:46 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2020-01-17 10:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 3/9] s390x: Add cpu id to interrupt error prints Janosch Frank
2020-01-17 10:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/9] s390x: smp: Rework cpu start and active tracking Janosch Frank
2020-01-20 12:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-20 13:16 ` Thomas Huth
2020-01-20 13:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-20 14:47 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-20 14:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-17 10:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 5/9] s390x: smp: Wait for cpu setup to finish Janosch Frank
2020-01-20 11:04 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-20 12:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-17 10:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 6/9] s390x: smp: Loop if secondary cpu returns into cpu setup again Janosch Frank
2020-01-20 11:27 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-20 12:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-17 10:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 7/9] s390x: smp: Remove unneeded cpu loops Janosch Frank
2020-01-20 11:29 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-20 14:41 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-20 16:11 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-21 12:46 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 12:59 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-21 13:07 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-17 10:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 8/9] s390x: smp: Test all CRs on initial reset Janosch Frank
2020-01-20 11:44 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-20 12:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-20 14:49 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-20 14:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-17 10:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 9/9] s390x: smp: Dirty fpc before initial reset test Janosch Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200117104640.1983-3-frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox