From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 1/9] s390x: smp: Cleanup smp.c
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 08:42:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200121134254.4570-2-frankja@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200121134254.4570-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Let's remove a lot of badly formatted code by introducing the
wait_for_flag() and set_flag functions.
Also let's remove some stray spaces and always set the tesflag before
using it.
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
s390x/smp.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/s390x/smp.c b/s390x/smp.c
index ab7e46c..e37eb56 100644
--- a/s390x/smp.c
+++ b/s390x/smp.c
@@ -22,6 +22,19 @@
static int testflag = 0;
+static void wait_for_flag(void)
+{
+ while (!testflag)
+ mb();
+}
+
+static void set_flag(int val)
+{
+ mb();
+ testflag = val;
+ mb();
+}
+
static void cpu_loop(void)
{
for (;;) {}
@@ -29,21 +42,19 @@ static void cpu_loop(void)
static void test_func(void)
{
- testflag = 1;
- mb();
+ set_flag(1);
cpu_loop();
}
static void test_start(void)
{
struct psw psw;
- psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
+ psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
+ set_flag(0);
smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
- while (!testflag) {
- mb();
- }
+ wait_for_flag();
report(1, "start");
}
@@ -112,27 +123,27 @@ static void ecall(void)
mask = extract_psw_mask();
mask |= PSW_MASK_EXT;
load_psw_mask(mask);
- testflag = 1;
+ set_flag(1);
while (lc->ext_int_code != 0x1202) { mb(); }
report(1, "ecall");
- testflag= 1;
+ set_flag(1);
}
static void test_ecall(void)
{
struct psw psw;
- psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
+ psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
psw.addr = (unsigned long)ecall;
report_prefix_push("ecall");
- testflag= 0;
+ set_flag(0);
smp_cpu_destroy(1);
smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
- while (!testflag) { mb(); }
- testflag= 0;
+ wait_for_flag();
+ set_flag(0);
sigp(1, SIGP_EXTERNAL_CALL, 0, NULL);
- while(!testflag) {mb();}
+ wait_for_flag();
smp_cpu_stop(1);
report_prefix_pop();
}
@@ -147,27 +158,27 @@ static void emcall(void)
mask = extract_psw_mask();
mask |= PSW_MASK_EXT;
load_psw_mask(mask);
- testflag= 1;
+ set_flag(1);
while (lc->ext_int_code != 0x1201) { mb(); }
report(1, "ecall");
- testflag = 1;
+ set_flag(1);
}
static void test_emcall(void)
{
struct psw psw;
- psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
+ psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
psw.addr = (unsigned long)emcall;
report_prefix_push("emcall");
- testflag= 0;
+ set_flag(0);
smp_cpu_destroy(1);
smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
- while (!testflag) { mb(); }
- testflag= 0;
+ wait_for_flag();
+ set_flag(0);
sigp(1, SIGP_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL, 0, NULL);
- while(!testflag) { mb(); }
+ wait_for_flag();
smp_cpu_stop(1);
report_prefix_pop();
}
@@ -177,7 +188,7 @@ static void test_reset_initial(void)
struct cpu_status *status = alloc_pages(0);
struct psw psw;
- psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
+ psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
report_prefix_push("reset initial");
@@ -208,7 +219,7 @@ static void test_reset(void)
{
struct psw psw;
- psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
+ psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
report_prefix_push("cpu reset");
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-21 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-21 13:42 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 0/9] s390x: smp: Improve smp code and reset checks Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 13:42 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2020-01-21 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 2/9] s390x: smp: Only use smp_cpu_setup once Janosch Frank
2020-01-23 13:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-23 13:54 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-23 13:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-24 8:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-24 8:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 3/9] s390x: Add cpu id to interrupt error prints Janosch Frank
2020-01-23 10:02 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-23 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] " Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 4/9] s390x: smp: Rework cpu start and active tracking Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 17:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-22 8:25 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-23 9:14 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] " Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 5/9] s390x: smp: Wait for cpu setup to finish Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 6/9] s390x: smp: Loop if secondary cpu returns into cpu setup again Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 14:28 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-21 17:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-23 13:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-23 13:47 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 7/9] s390x: smp: Remove unneeded cpu loops Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 14:30 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-21 17:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 8/9] s390x: smp: Test all CRs on initial reset Janosch Frank
2020-01-21 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 9/9] s390x: smp: Dirty fpc before initial reset test Janosch Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200121134254.4570-2-frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox