From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] x86: Use "-cpu host" for PCID tests
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 07:44:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200205154444.GE4877@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <150744a7-5be7-8ed6-9eea-cc9c1b46a425@redhat.com>
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 04:26:40PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 04/02/20 20:48, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Use the host CPU model for the PCID tests to allow testing the various
> > combinations of PCID and INVPCID enabled/disabled without having to
> > manually change the kvm-unit-tests command line. I.e. give users the
> > option of changing the command line *OR* running on a (virtual) CPU
> > with or without PCID and/or INVPCID.
>
> I don't understand. :)
I was trying to test a change in the code that clears INVPCID in guest's
CPUID if PCID isn't supported. To do that, I ran the PCID unit test in L1,
using L0 Qemu to hide PCID and/or INVPCID from L1 to iterate over the four
combinations of PCID and INVPCID being enabled/disabled. But the test in
L1 never exercised INVPCID=y because unittest.cfg runs with the test with
"-cpu=qemu64,+pcid".
By using qemu64, the only way to test INVPCID=y is to manually run the test
a different "-cpu..." command. The idea behind "-cpu=host" is to enable
running different combinations of the test in L1 by hiding features from L1
instead of by running the test with different commands.
In other words, if I create an L1 with PCID=y and INVPCID=y, I expect that
running the as-configured PCID unit tests would actually test PCID=Y and
INVPCID=y.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-05 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-04 19:48 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] x86: Use "-cpu host" for PCID tests Sean Christopherson
2020-02-05 11:37 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-02-05 14:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-02-05 15:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-02-05 15:44 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200205154444.GE4877@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox