From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81B3C352A2 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 22:28:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF44218AC for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 22:28:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="dZayu8PS" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727456AbgBEW2h (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2020 17:28:37 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:55195 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727106AbgBEW2g (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2020 17:28:36 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1580941715; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xN2n9jkJvkSR0RH/zWMkRvEj2quGdHH6HsawLgUOQOY=; b=dZayu8PSLv8/6Ghp/Mvv7c0KUzqbWjN5IIgGibeer+EBeiKqDOlXCaalVEpr6ZHR95R2GI VzU86wDDsDrXGyCnKZv+jIJlIvU+xnJCrs0cxrgFbboUOecFaMHeazhhK/Mzufp6KD09Vt vg+jgAiZu2w8ckESHO35/pIAhmie0tQ= Received: from mail-qv1-f69.google.com (mail-qv1-f69.google.com [209.85.219.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-63-TEkUgV6ROnWI1Te2B6wR7w-1; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 17:28:34 -0500 X-MC-Unique: TEkUgV6ROnWI1Te2B6wR7w-1 Received: by mail-qv1-f69.google.com with SMTP id g6so2476391qvp.0 for ; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 14:28:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=xN2n9jkJvkSR0RH/zWMkRvEj2quGdHH6HsawLgUOQOY=; b=UTX8XJLZ/0yX7n66McEfUjjQh89+VohTQGjaOSy1Z+1EitqtDRmaNTSYQ03xtIMAkk CDjEQR7ulTxIFoRmXVrsCDyUdgqV8ak2yfnvuPsAweBt4UkmW/DeRaK05BkHYYHRMweX MAcKFjMpj7JgzsmscZLglZBc7CtBqXH4qMZZqMeGQLOU8FylQjhMsJ0rgnYEmVzn4f/P VS8QxW6WmX4K9VCn/nyn6zE7vYCpd0rN61g545KNjDxKJTADHBWXWdUht9bI+g7aT7LT Qcco2E0lle/4okZ6kkmiCvy6TCNEX5cGHTfrcBBAWCvk7CID8kUx8p1o1Kov8sLN7RJB LSlQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUa9Neid/g1zjlmzYA7SqT/nKIC8uc9StKQSe/9c8vG7RQvxZds gVDTKovKwM0njPz7HeO0tjXA/euTqPhk59DO583i/bw2iMWbFb/ScIHb6Z5S3FRzjyOgbvauwRQ KCL7aYjXbc/QG X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:a46:: with SMTP id j6mr13674qka.164.1580941714103; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 14:28:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzgDC/fBZ4GnRbk3BQEXE+eWIhbbieAb4nE+MGEKdPSLikBImrRnbk5qAuaCcwE1K66PslinA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:a46:: with SMTP id j6mr13650qka.164.1580941713724; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 14:28:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from xz-x1 ([2607:9880:19c8:32::2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c184sm503353qke.118.2020.02.05.14.28.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 05 Feb 2020 14:28:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 17:28:29 -0500 From: Peter Xu To: Sean Christopherson Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Paul Mackerras , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , David Hildenbrand , Cornelia Huck , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , Marc Zyngier , James Morse , Julien Thierry , Suzuki K Poulose , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoffer Dall , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/19] KVM: Don't free new memslot if allocation of said memslot fails Message-ID: <20200205222829.GF387680@xz-x1> References: <20200121223157.15263-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> <20200121223157.15263-4-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200121223157.15263-4-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 02:31:41PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote: > The two implementations of kvm_arch_create_memslot() in x86 and PPC are > both good citizens and free up all local resources if creation fails. > Return immediately (via a superfluous goto) instead of calling > kvm_free_memslot(). > > Note, the call to kvm_free_memslot() is effectively an expensive nop in > this case as there are no resources to be freed. (I failed to understand why that is expensive.. but the change looks OK) > > No functional change intended. > > Acked-by: Christoffer Dall > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson Reviewed-by: Peter Xu -- Peter Xu