From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: linmiaohe <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com,
wanpengli@tencent.com, jmattson@google.com, joro@8bytes.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: apic: avoid calculating pending eoi from an uninitialized val
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 09:20:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200220172038.GB3972@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8736b56wxe.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 05:33:17PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> linmiaohe <linmiaohe@huawei.com> writes:
>
> > From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
> >
> > When get user eoi value failed, var val would be uninitialized and result
> > in calculating pending eoi from an uninitialized val. Initialize var val
> > to 0 to fix this case.
>
> Let me try to suggest an alternative wording,
>
> "When pv_eoi_get_user() fails, 'val' may remain uninitialized and the
> return value of pv_eoi_get_pending() becomes random. Fix the issue by
> initializing the variable."
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > index 4f14ec7525f6..7e77e94f3176 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > @@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ static inline bool pv_eoi_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >
> > static bool pv_eoi_get_pending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > {
> > - u8 val;
> > + u8 val = 0;
Rather than initialize @val, I'd prefer to explicitly handle the error,
similar to pv_eoi_clr_pending() and pv_eoi_set_pending(), e.g.
u8 val;
if (pv_eoi_get_user(vcpu, &val) < 0) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "Can't read EOI MSR value: 0x%llx\n",
(unsigned long long)vcpu->arch.pv_eoi.msr_val);
return false;
}
return val & 0x1;
> > if (pv_eoi_get_user(vcpu, &val) < 0)
> > printk(KERN_WARNING "Can't read EOI MSR value: 0x%llx\n",
> > (unsigned long long)vcpu->arch.pv_eoi.msr_val);
>
> Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
>
> But why compilers don't complain?
Clang might?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-20 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-20 15:36 [PATCH] KVM: apic: avoid calculating pending eoi from an uninitialized val linmiaohe
2020-02-20 16:33 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-02-20 17:20 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-02-21 1:31 linmiaohe
2020-02-21 1:36 linmiaohe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200220172038.GB3972@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).