From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: x86: Make traced and returned value of kvm_cpuid consistent again
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 08:38:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200302163834.GA6244@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <688edd4d-81ad-bb6b-f166-4fb26a90bb9e@redhat.com>
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 05:11:57PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Queued, thanks.
Too fast, too fast!
On Sun, Mar 01, 2020 at 11:47:20AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>
> After 43561123ab37, found is not set correctly in case of leaves 0BH,
> 1FH, or anything out-of-range.
No, found is set correctly, kvm_cpuid() should return true if and only if
an exact match for the requested function is found, and that's the original
tracing behavior of "found" (pre-43561123ab37).
> This is currently harmless for the return value because the only caller
> evaluating it passes leaf 0x80000008.
No, it's 100% correct. Well, technically it's irrelevant because the only
caller, check_cr_write(), passes %false for check_limit, i.e. found will be
true if and only if entry 0x80000008 exists. But, in a purely hypothetical
scenario where the emulator passed check_limit=%true, the intent of "found"
is to report that the exact leaf was found, not if some random entry was
found.
> However, the trace entry is now misleading due to this inaccuracy. It is
> furthermore misleading because it reports the effective function, not
> the originally passed one. Fix that as well.
>
> Fixes: 43561123ab37 ("kvm: x86: Improve emulation of CPUID leaves 0BH and 1FH")
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> index b1c469446b07..79a738f313f8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -1000,13 +1000,12 @@ static bool cpuid_function_in_range(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 function)
> bool kvm_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 *eax, u32 *ebx,
> u32 *ecx, u32 *edx, bool check_limit)
> {
> - u32 function = *eax, index = *ecx;
> + u32 orig_function = *eax, function = *eax, index = *ecx;
> struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry;
> struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *max;
Rather than add another variable, this can be cleaned up to remove "max".
cpuid_function_in_range() also has a bug. I've got patches, in the process
of whipping up a unit test.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-02 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-01 10:47 [PATCH] kvm: x86: Make traced and returned value of kvm_cpuid consistent again Jan Kiszka
2020-03-01 12:25 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-02 6:19 ` Jan Kiszka
2020-03-02 16:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-03-02 16:38 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-03-02 16:46 ` Jan Kiszka
2020-03-02 17:55 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200302163834.GA6244@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox