public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: x86: CPUID emulation and tracing fixes
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:12:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200305171204.GI11500@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6071310f-dd4b-6a6d-5578-7b6f72a9b1be@redhat.com>

On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 05:42:59PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 05/03/20 02:34, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > 
> > In theory, everything up to the refactoring is non-controversial, i.e. we
> > can bikeshed the refactoring without delaying the bug fixes.
> 
> Even the refactoring itself is much less controversial.  I queued
> everything, there's always time to unqueue.

Looks like the build-time assertions don't play nice with older versions of
gcc :-(

config: x86_64-randconfig-s2-20200305 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-4.9 (Debian 4.9.2-10+deb8u1) 4.9.2
reproduce:
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=x86_64 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from include/linux/export.h:43:0,
                    from include/linux/linkage.h:7,
                    from include/linux/preempt.h:10,
                    from include/linux/hardirq.h:5,
                    from include/linux/kvm_host.h:7,
                    from arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:21:
   arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c: In function 'em_cpuid':
>> include/linux/compiler.h:350:38: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_3957' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_AuthenticAMD_ebx != *(u32 *)"Auth" || X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_AuthenticAMD_edx != *(u32 *)"enti" || X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_AuthenticAMD_ecx != *(u32 *)"cAMD"
     _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __LINE__)


  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-05 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-05  1:34 [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: x86: CPUID emulation and tracing fixes Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05  1:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: x86: Trace the original requested CPUID function in kvm_cpuid() Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05 17:50   ` Jim Mattson
2020-03-05  1:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: x86: Add helpers to perform CPUID-based guest vendor check Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05  3:48   ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-05 19:58     ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05 18:07   ` Jim Mattson
2020-03-05  1:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] KVM x86: Extend AMD specific guest behavior to Hygon virtual CPUs Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05  1:34 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: x86: Fix CPUID range checks for Hypervisor and Centaur classes Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05 18:43   ` Jim Mattson
2020-03-05 19:25     ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05 21:10       ` Jim Mattson
2020-03-05 21:51         ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-06  9:03           ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-03-10 17:10             ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-10 17:23               ` Jim Mattson
2020-03-05  1:34 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] KVM: x86: Add build-time assertions on validity of vendor strings Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05  1:34 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] KVM: x86: Refactor out-of-range logic to contain the madness Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05  1:34 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] KVM: x86: Refactor kvm_cpuid() param that controls out-of-range logic Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05 16:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: x86: CPUID emulation and tracing fixes Paolo Bonzini
2020-03-05 17:12   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-03-06  8:45     ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200305171204.GI11500@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=puwen@hygon.cn \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox