From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: VMX: untangle VMXON revision_id setting when using eVMCS
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 19:37:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200305183725.28872-3-vkuznets@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200305183725.28872-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
As stated in alloc_vmxon_regions(), VMXON region needs to be tagged with
revision id from MSR_IA32_VMX_BASIC even in case of eVMCS. The logic to
do so is not very straightforward: first, we set
hdr.revision_id = KVM_EVMCS_VERSION in alloc_vmcs_cpu() just to reset it
back to vmcs_config.revision_id in alloc_vmxon_regions(). Simplify this by
introducing 'enum vmcs_type' parameter to alloc_vmcs_cpu().
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 32 ++++++++++++++------------------
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h | 12 +++++++++---
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index dab19e4e5f2b..697be8823576 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -2554,7 +2554,7 @@ static __init int setup_vmcs_config(struct vmcs_config *vmcs_conf,
return 0;
}
-struct vmcs *alloc_vmcs_cpu(bool shadow, int cpu, gfp_t flags)
+struct vmcs *alloc_vmcs_cpu(enum vmcs_type type, int cpu, gfp_t flags)
{
int node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
struct page *pages;
@@ -2566,13 +2566,21 @@ struct vmcs *alloc_vmcs_cpu(bool shadow, int cpu, gfp_t flags)
vmcs = page_address(pages);
memset(vmcs, 0, vmcs_config.size);
- /* KVM supports Enlightened VMCS v1 only */
- if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs))
+ /*
+ * When eVMCS is enabled, vmcs->revision_id needs to be set to the
+ * supported eVMCS version (KVM_EVMCS_VERSION) instead of revision_id
+ * reported by MSR_IA32_VMX_BASIC.
+ *
+ * However, even though not explicitly documented by TLFS, VMXArea
+ * passed as VMXON argument should still be marked with revision_id
+ * reported by physical CPU.
+ */
+ if (type != VMXON_REGION && static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs))
vmcs->hdr.revision_id = KVM_EVMCS_VERSION;
else
vmcs->hdr.revision_id = vmcs_config.revision_id;
- if (shadow)
+ if (type == SHADOW_VMCS_REGION)
vmcs->hdr.shadow_vmcs = 1;
return vmcs;
}
@@ -2652,25 +2660,13 @@ static __init int alloc_vmxon_regions(void)
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct vmcs *vmcs;
- vmcs = alloc_vmcs_cpu(false, cpu, GFP_KERNEL);
+ /* The VMXON region is really just a special type of VMCS. */
+ vmcs = alloc_vmcs_cpu(VMXON_REGION, cpu, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!vmcs) {
free_vmxon_regions();
return -ENOMEM;
}
- /*
- * When eVMCS is enabled, alloc_vmcs_cpu() sets
- * vmcs->revision_id to KVM_EVMCS_VERSION instead of
- * revision_id reported by MSR_IA32_VMX_BASIC.
- *
- * However, even though not explicitly documented by
- * TLFS, VMXArea passed as VMXON argument should
- * still be marked with revision_id reported by
- * physical CPU.
- */
- if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs))
- vmcs->hdr.revision_id = vmcs_config.revision_id;
-
per_cpu(vmxarea, cpu) = vmcs;
}
return 0;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
index e64da06c7009..4c327030bb9c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
@@ -489,7 +489,13 @@ static inline struct pi_desc *vcpu_to_pi_desc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return &(to_vmx(vcpu)->pi_desc);
}
-struct vmcs *alloc_vmcs_cpu(bool shadow, int cpu, gfp_t flags);
+enum vmcs_type {
+ VMXON_REGION,
+ VMCS_REGION,
+ SHADOW_VMCS_REGION,
+};
+
+struct vmcs *alloc_vmcs_cpu(enum vmcs_type type, int cpu, gfp_t flags);
void free_vmcs(struct vmcs *vmcs);
int alloc_loaded_vmcs(struct loaded_vmcs *loaded_vmcs);
void free_loaded_vmcs(struct loaded_vmcs *loaded_vmcs);
@@ -498,8 +504,8 @@ void loaded_vmcs_clear(struct loaded_vmcs *loaded_vmcs);
static inline struct vmcs *alloc_vmcs(bool shadow)
{
- return alloc_vmcs_cpu(shadow, raw_smp_processor_id(),
- GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
+ return alloc_vmcs_cpu(shadow ? SHADOW_VMCS_REGION : VMCS_REGION,
+ raw_smp_processor_id(), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
}
u64 construct_eptp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long root_hpa);
--
2.24.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-05 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-05 18:37 [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: VMX: cleanup VMXON region allocation Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-03-05 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: VMX: rename 'kvm_area' to 'vmxon_region' Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-03-05 18:37 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2020-03-05 20:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: VMX: untangle VMXON revision_id setting when using eVMCS Sean Christopherson
2020-03-06 10:06 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200305183725.28872-3-vkuznets@redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox