From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302A0C4332B for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 19:43:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5D220777 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 19:43:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726925AbgCTTm7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 15:42:59 -0400 Received: from 8bytes.org ([81.169.241.247]:54608 "EHLO theia.8bytes.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726843AbgCTTm6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 15:42:58 -0400 Received: by theia.8bytes.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CD3DA4CA; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 20:42:56 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 20:42:52 +0100 From: Joerg Roedel To: Dave Hansen Cc: Andy Lutomirski , X86 ML , "H. Peter Anvin" , Dave Hansen , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Hellstrom , Jiri Slaby , Dan Williams , Tom Lendacky , Juergen Gross , Kees Cook , LKML , kvm list , Linux Virtualization , Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2.1] x86/sev-es: Handle NMI State Message-ID: <20200320194251.GI5122@8bytes.org> References: <20200319091407.1481-1-joro@8bytes.org> <20200319091407.1481-71-joro@8bytes.org> <20200320131707.GF5122@8bytes.org> <7d1ee9d9-d333-4529-b21b-19758c99e029@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7d1ee9d9-d333-4529-b21b-19758c99e029@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 07:42:09AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > FWIW, perf plus the x86 selftests run in a big loop was my best way of > stressing the NMI path when we mucked with it for PTI. The selftests > make sure to hit some of the more rare entry/exit paths. Yeah, I ran the x86 selftests in an SEV-ES guest on-top of these patches, that works. But doing this together with 'perf top' is also on the list of tests to do. Regards, Joerg