Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 30 (vhost)

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:27:48AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> 
> On 2020/3/31 上午1:22, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 3/30/20 2:43 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > The merge window has opened, so please do not add any material for the
> > > next release into your linux-next included trees/branches until after
> > > the merge window closes.
> > > 
> > > Changes since 20200327:
> > > 
> > > The vhost tree gained a conflict against the kvm-arm tree.
> > > 
> > (note: today's linux-next is on 5.6-rc7.)
> > 
> > on x86_64:
> > 
> > # CONFIG_EVENTFD is not set
> > 
> > ../drivers/vhost/vhost.c: In function 'vhost_vring_ioctl':
> > ../drivers/vhost/vhost.c:1577:33: error: implicit declaration of function 'eventfd_fget'; did you mean 'eventfd_signal'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >     eventfp = f.fd == -1 ? NULL : eventfd_fget(f.fd);
> >                                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> >                                   eventfd_signal
> > ../drivers/vhost/vhost.c:1577:31: warning: pointer/integer type mismatch in conditional expression
> >     eventfp = f.fd == -1 ? NULL : eventfd_fget(f.fd);
> 
> 
> Will fix.
> 
> VHOST should depend on EVENTFD now.
> 
> Thanks


I did that and pushed. Pls take a look.

> 
> >                                 ^
> >