From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 08/10] s390x: smp: Wait for sigp completion
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 05:10:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200423091013.11587-9-frankja@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200423091013.11587-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Sigp orders are not necessarily finished when the processor finished
the sigp instruction. We need to poll if the order has been finished
before we continue.
For (re)start and stop we already use sigp sense running and sigp
sense loops. But we still lack completion checks for stop and store
status, as well as the cpu resets.
Let's add them.
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
---
lib/s390x/smp.c | 8 ++++++++
lib/s390x/smp.h | 1 +
s390x/smp.c | 4 ++++
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/s390x/smp.c b/lib/s390x/smp.c
index 6ef0335..2555bf4 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/smp.c
+++ b/lib/s390x/smp.c
@@ -154,6 +154,14 @@ int smp_cpu_start(uint16_t addr, struct psw psw)
return rc;
}
+void smp_cpu_wait_for_completion(uint16_t addr)
+{
+ uint32_t status;
+
+ /* Loops when cc == 2, i.e. when the cpu is busy with a sigp order */
+ sigp_retry(1, SIGP_SENSE, 0, &status);
+}
+
int smp_cpu_destroy(uint16_t addr)
{
struct cpu *cpu;
diff --git a/lib/s390x/smp.h b/lib/s390x/smp.h
index ce63a89..a8b98c0 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/smp.h
+++ b/lib/s390x/smp.h
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ int smp_cpu_restart(uint16_t addr);
int smp_cpu_start(uint16_t addr, struct psw psw);
int smp_cpu_stop(uint16_t addr);
int smp_cpu_stop_store_status(uint16_t addr);
+void smp_cpu_wait_for_completion(uint16_t addr);
int smp_cpu_destroy(uint16_t addr);
int smp_cpu_setup(uint16_t addr, struct psw psw);
void smp_teardown(void);
diff --git a/s390x/smp.c b/s390x/smp.c
index 7462211..48321f4 100644
--- a/s390x/smp.c
+++ b/s390x/smp.c
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ static void test_stop_store_status(void)
lc->prefix_sa = 0;
lc->grs_sa[15] = 0;
smp_cpu_stop_store_status(1);
+ smp_cpu_wait_for_completion(1);
mb();
report(lc->prefix_sa == (uint32_t)(uintptr_t)cpu->lowcore, "prefix");
report(lc->grs_sa[15], "stack");
@@ -85,6 +86,7 @@ static void test_stop_store_status(void)
lc->prefix_sa = 0;
lc->grs_sa[15] = 0;
smp_cpu_stop_store_status(1);
+ smp_cpu_wait_for_completion(1);
mb();
report(lc->prefix_sa == (uint32_t)(uintptr_t)cpu->lowcore, "prefix");
report(lc->grs_sa[15], "stack");
@@ -215,6 +217,7 @@ static void test_reset_initial(void)
wait_for_flag();
sigp_retry(1, SIGP_INITIAL_CPU_RESET, 0, NULL);
+ smp_cpu_wait_for_completion(1);
sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_STATUS_AT_ADDRESS, (uintptr_t)status, NULL);
report_prefix_push("clear");
@@ -264,6 +267,7 @@ static void test_reset(void)
smp_cpu_start(1, psw);
sigp_retry(1, SIGP_CPU_RESET, 0, NULL);
+ smp_cpu_wait_for_completion(1);
report(smp_cpu_stopped(1), "cpu stopped");
set_flag(0);
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-23 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-23 9:10 [PATCH v2 00/10] s390x: smp: Improve smp code part 2 Janosch Frank
2020-04-23 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] s390x: smp: Test all CRs on initial reset Janosch Frank
2020-04-23 15:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-04-24 9:33 ` [PATCH v3] " Janosch Frank
2020-04-24 10:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-04-23 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] s390x: smp: Dirty fpc before initial reset test Janosch Frank
2020-04-23 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] s390x: smp: Test stop and store status on a running and stopped cpu Janosch Frank
2020-04-23 16:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-04-23 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] s390x: smp: Test local interrupts after cpu reset Janosch Frank
2020-04-24 10:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-04-24 11:51 ` Janosch Frank
2020-04-23 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] s390x: smp: Loop if secondary cpu returns into cpu setup again Janosch Frank
2020-04-24 10:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-04-23 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] s390x: smp: Remove unneeded cpu loops Janosch Frank
2020-04-23 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] s390x: smp: Use full PSW to bringup new cpu Janosch Frank
2020-04-24 10:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-04-24 11:16 ` Janosch Frank
2020-04-24 11:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-04-24 11:31 ` Janosch Frank
2020-04-23 9:10 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2020-04-24 10:11 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] s390x: smp: Wait for sigp completion David Hildenbrand
2020-04-24 11:40 ` Janosch Frank
2020-04-29 8:57 ` Janosch Frank
2020-04-29 9:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-04-29 9:37 ` Janosch Frank
2020-04-29 9:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-04-29 11:21 ` Janosch Frank
2020-04-29 11:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-04-29 12:09 ` Janosch Frank
2020-04-29 12:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-04-23 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] s390x: smp: Add restart when running test Janosch Frank
2020-04-24 10:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-04-23 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] s390x: Fix library constant definitions Janosch Frank
2020-04-24 10:13 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200423091013.11587-9-frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox