From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: tglx@linutronix.de, pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, maz@kernel.org, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
rostedt@goodmis.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
will@kernel.org, joel@joelfernandes.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
dave@stgolabs.net, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] rcuwait: Fix stale wake call name in comment
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 22:48:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200424054837.5138-2-dave@stgolabs.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200424054837.5138-1-dave@stgolabs.net>
The 'trywake' name was renamed to simply 'wake', update the comment.
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
---
kernel/exit.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 389a88cb3081..9f9015f3f6b0 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ void rcuwait_wake_up(struct rcuwait *w)
/*
* Order condition vs @task, such that everything prior to the load
* of @task is visible. This is the condition as to why the user called
- * rcuwait_trywake() in the first place. Pairs with set_current_state()
+ * rcuwait_wake() in the first place. Pairs with set_current_state()
* barrier (A) in rcuwait_wait_event().
*
* WAIT WAKE
--
2.16.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-24 5:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-24 5:48 [PATCH v4 0/5] kvm: Use rcuwait for vcpu blocking Davidlohr Bueso
2020-04-24 5:48 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2020-04-24 5:48 ` [PATCH 2/5] rcuwait: Let rcuwait_wake_up() return whether or not a task was awoken Davidlohr Bueso
2020-04-24 5:48 ` [PATCH 3/5] rcuwait: Introduce prepare_to and finish_rcuwait Davidlohr Bueso
2020-04-24 5:48 ` [PATCH 4/5] rcuwait: Introduce rcuwait_active() Davidlohr Bueso
2020-04-24 9:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-18 10:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-18 16:37 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2020-05-19 0:34 ` Wanpeng Li
2020-04-24 5:48 ` [PATCH 5/5] kvm: Replace vcpu->swait with rcuwait Davidlohr Bueso
2020-04-25 10:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-25 22:30 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2020-05-18 8:51 ` Wanpeng Li
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-04-22 4:07 [PATCH v3 -tip 0/5] kvm: Use rcuwait for vcpu blocking Davidlohr Bueso
2020-04-22 4:07 ` [PATCH 1/5] rcuwait: Fix stale wake call name in comment Davidlohr Bueso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200424054837.5138-2-dave@stgolabs.net \
--to=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=dbueso@suse.de \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox